Comparison Overview

Compass Advocacy

VS

Public and Commercial Services Union

Compass Advocacy

48 Maryland Ave, Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.compassadvocacy.com/

Founded in 2018 by preeminent lobbyist Hannah Garagiola, Compass Advocacy is headquartered in the heart of Annapolis. In addition, we operate a government relations and law office in downtown Rockville, Maryland. We also advocate in Dover, Delaware. Our team is comprised of passionate lobbyists, consultants, creatives, attorneys, and problem-solvers ready to advocate for our clients. Compass Advocacy is comprised of three separate and distinct businesses to holistically navigate challenging client issues in the government relations, public relations, and the legal arena. Each business can work independently or synergistically to meet a client’s needs. Oftentimes, a client uses the services of all three businesses to accomplish their objectives. We work smartly, efficiently and with energy, passion, and dedication.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Public and Commercial Services Union

160 Falcon Road, London, GB, SW11 2LN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pcs.org.uk

The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) is one of the largest trade unions in the UK, with around 200,000 members. We are organised throughout the civil service and government agencies, making us the UK’s largest civil service trade union. We also organise widely in the private sector, usually in areas that have been privatised. We are a democratic organisation, run by our members, for our members. We campaign for fair pay and conditions, decent pensions for all and equality in the workplace and beyond. If you're not a member of PCS, there's never been a better time to join the union.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-and-commercial-services-union.jpeg
Public and Commercial Services Union
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compass Advocacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public and Commercial Services Union
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Advocacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public and Commercial Services Union in 2025.

Incident History — Compass Advocacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Advocacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public and Commercial Services Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public and Commercial Services Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/public-and-commercial-services-union.jpeg
Public and Commercial Services Union
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Public and Commercial Services Union company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Compass Advocacy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public and Commercial Services Union company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Compass Advocacy company.

In the current year, Public and Commercial Services Union company and Compass Advocacy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public and Commercial Services Union company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public and Commercial Services Union company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public and Commercial Services Union company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Public and Commercial Services Union company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Public and Commercial Services Union company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Public and Commercial Services Union company employs more people globally than Compass Advocacy company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Public and Commercial Services Union holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References