Comparison Overview

Compass Advocacy

VS

Park&K Public Affairs

Compass Advocacy

48 Maryland Ave, Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.compassadvocacy.com/

Founded in 2018 by preeminent lobbyist Hannah Garagiola, Compass Advocacy is headquartered in the heart of Annapolis. In addition, we operate a government relations and law office in downtown Rockville, Maryland. We also advocate in Dover, Delaware. Our team is comprised of passionate lobbyists, consultants, creatives, attorneys, and problem-solvers ready to advocate for our clients. Compass Advocacy is comprised of three separate and distinct businesses to holistically navigate challenging client issues in the government relations, public relations, and the legal arena. Each business can work independently or synergistically to meet a client’s needs. Oftentimes, a client uses the services of all three businesses to accomplish their objectives. We work smartly, efficiently and with energy, passion, and dedication.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Park&K Public Affairs

116 Nassau St, New York, NY, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.parkandk.com

Park&K Public Affairs provides local and federal government relations and strategic communications guidance to clients from regional offices in Washington D.C., Florida, New York, Puerto Rico and Texas. As a boutique firm, we deliver bespoke services and individual attention. Every project we undertake is led by a Park&K principal from start to finish. Local Issues: Local Advice Our seasoned public relations professionals based in New York City, Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Dallas each have close relationships and experience working in local government. We lead clients to success in legislatve and budget initiatives as well as providing guidance for strategic growth, procurements and entry into government business oppertunities. We combine traditional "shoeleather" lobbying practices with modern communications savvy and overall project management to help clients reach their objectives. Our team has developed particular expertise with institutional, educational and not-for-profit clients.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parkandk.jpeg
Park&K Public Affairs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compass Advocacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Park&K Public Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Advocacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Park&K Public Affairs in 2025.

Incident History — Compass Advocacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Advocacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Park&K Public Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Park&K Public Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parkandk.jpeg
Park&K Public Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Compass Advocacy company and Park&K Public Affairs company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Park&K Public Affairs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Compass Advocacy company.

In the current year, Park&K Public Affairs company and Compass Advocacy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Park&K Public Affairs company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Park&K Public Affairs company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Park&K Public Affairs company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Park&K Public Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Park&K Public Affairs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Compass Advocacy company employs more people globally than Park&K Public Affairs company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Park&K Public Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References