Comparison Overview

R & R Graphics

VS

DuraMark Technologies, Inc.

R & R Graphics

24 Steeplechase Circle, Horsham, 19044, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rnrgraphics.com

At R & R Graphics we provide our customers with a unique business model to help them with their printing projects. We bring our extensive experience to the table to help produce a print job in the most cost effective and efficient manner possible, and we're great guys to work with. Give is a call at 215-530-2361 when your next project is in the planning stage. At that point we can do the most good for you. Make R & R your production arm and you'll never have to worry about your printing projects again.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DuraMark Technologies, Inc.

16450 Southpark Drive, WESTFIELD, Indiana, 46074, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://duramarktechnologies.com/enterprise-solutions/

At DuraMark Technologies, we are radically changing the way people manage their durable safety labels and branding decals. While tremendous advances have been made in virtually every aspect of manufacturing, why continue to use the same traditional methods of printing individual labels on old screen printers and flexographic printers like we’ve done for the past hundred years? That’s the question we asked ourselves when we decided to form our company in 2007. Old traditional methods of printing were and are still fraught with significant challenges costing time, money and reducing the quality of the products they’re applied to. DuraMark’s 100% digital technology has changed the durable labeling playing field. Whether you're looking for ways to better support your lean manufacturing and quality assurance practices or simply looking for higher quality labels at a better price, DuraMark will give you the durability, flexibility and speed your company demands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
R & R Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duramark-technologies-llc.jpeg
DuraMark Technologies, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R & R Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DuraMark Technologies, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R & R Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DuraMark Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — R & R Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R & R Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DuraMark Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DuraMark Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
R & R Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duramark-technologies-llc.jpeg
DuraMark Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

R & R Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R & R Graphics company.

In the current year, DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company and R & R Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company nor R & R Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company nor R & R Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company nor R & R Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R & R Graphics company nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R & R Graphics company nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DuraMark Technologies, Inc. company employs more people globally than R & R Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R & R Graphics nor DuraMark Technologies, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References