Comparison Overview

Community Residences, Inc

VS

Shiloh House

Community Residences, Inc

50 Rockwell Road, Newington, CT, 06111, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the Community Residences, Inc (CRI) Linked in page. Community Residences, Inc. is a not-for-profit corporation established in 1984. It is the principal goal of CRI to provide high quality residential, employment and foster/adoptive services to children and adults in the least restrictive manner possible. A key to reaching this goal is the hiring, training and retention of a highly qualified, involved and well-motivated staff. It is the mission of Community Residences Inc. to develop and operate quality community-based support services for children and adults, that values the individual, promotes independence, and maximizes personal choice and potential.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 224
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shiloh House

6588 W. Ottawa Ave, Littleton, 80228, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Based in Littleton, CO, and serving primarily Colorado youth and families, we provide therapeutic care and services, including educational programming, day treatment, residential care, and community based outpatient services, as well as independent living and wrap-around services. We strongly believe in building a circle of support around each youth in our care. We work closely with families and social services personnel. Our approach is based on over 30 years of experience creating an environment where wounds begin to heal, relationships are built or restored, and new possibilities are created.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 203
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-residences-inc.jpeg
Community Residences, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiloh-house.jpeg
Shiloh House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Community Residences, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shiloh House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Residences, Inc in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shiloh House in 2026.

Incident History — Community Residences, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Residences, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shiloh House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shiloh House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-residences-inc.jpeg
Community Residences, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiloh-house.jpeg
Shiloh House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Community Residences, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shiloh House company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shiloh House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Community Residences, Inc company.

In the current year, Shiloh House company and Community Residences, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shiloh House company nor Community Residences, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shiloh House company nor Community Residences, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shiloh House company nor Community Residences, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Community Residences, Inc company nor Shiloh House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Community Residences, Inc company nor Shiloh House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Community Residences, Inc company employs more people globally than Shiloh House company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Community Residences, Inc nor Shiloh House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H