Comparison Overview

De Novo Center for Justice and Healing

VS

US Legal Fund, LLC

De Novo Center for Justice and Healing

47 Thorndike Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02141, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

*Please note that we do not accept requests for legal assistance or counseling appointments through this page. Please contact our Intake and Referral Line at (617) 661-1010 from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday.* De Novo provides free civil legal assistance and affordable psychological counseling to low-income people. Our services combat the effects of poverty and violence by helping clients and their children meet basic human needs for safety, income, health and housing. De Novo draws on the expertise of 140 dedicated volunteer attorneys, clinical social workers, psychologists, paralegals, interpreters, student interns, and other professionals to provide cost-effective services that serve our community’s most vulnerable members. We provide legal help in the areas of housing/homelessness prevention, child custody and domestic violence, immigrant and refugee rights, and disability benefits, as well as a full range of mental health and case management services to help clients cope with the emotional impact of trauma. Our holistic model of care means clients not only receive effective legal assistance, but also supportive therapy to help them navigate the enormous struggles they face. Learn more at denovo.org.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

US Legal Fund, LLC

315 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

US Legal Fund is a leading provider of non-recourse funding solutions on a nationwide basis. We offer fast, friendly, and reliable pre-settlement funding to clients who need relief from financial pressures while they wait for their case to settle. Our management team consists of attorneys who have practiced and fully understand personal injury law and the needs of clients and attorneys. We are an active member of the American Legal Finance Association (ALFA) and strictly adhere to their "best practices."

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-legal-services-and-counseling-center.jpeg
De Novo Center for Justice and Healing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
De Novo Center for Justice and Healing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Legal Fund, LLC
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for De Novo Center for Justice and Healing in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Legal Fund, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — De Novo Center for Justice and Healing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

De Novo Center for Justice and Healing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Legal Fund, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Legal Fund, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-legal-services-and-counseling-center.jpeg
De Novo Center for Justice and Healing
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-legal-fund-llc.jpeg
US Legal Fund, LLC
Incidents

FAQ

Both De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company and US Legal Fund, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, US Legal Fund, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company.

In the current year, US Legal Fund, LLC company and De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC company nor De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC company nor De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC company nor De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company nor US Legal Fund, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company nor US Legal Fund, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

De Novo Center for Justice and Healing company employs more people globally than US Legal Fund, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither De Novo Center for Justice and Healing nor US Legal Fund, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X