Comparison Overview

Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)

VS

Fieger Law

Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)

855, KH
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

CLEC was created in 1996 as a school of law of the University of San Francisco. Localized in 2001 and recognized by the Ministry of Interior, CLEC continued as a legal resource center, promoting the rule of law, justice, and democracy in Cambodia. CLEC legal empowerment activities combine legal awareness, training, legal aid services and advocacy supports. Its training is designed for a wide range of target groups including local communities and NGOs. CLEC has been involved in advocacy activities regarding a number of significant legal reform issues including the 2001 Land Law, the sub-decree on indigenous communal land titling, the establishment of the Arbitration Council, the election dispute resolution process, the drafting of the Peaceful Assembly Law, and commentary and review of numerous pieces of legislation. Since 2004, CLEC has embarked on high impact/public interest legal advocacy project (PILAP), particularly in the areas of land and natural resources. Legal representation, legal defense and consultation are becoming even more crucial as tools to support legal empowerment both in the improvement and assertion of the rights of communities and in law and policy development and enforcement. The PILAP has greatly impacted into all CLEC programs on Land and Natural Resource, Access to Justice, Labor and Good Governance, and it has become the main part of CLEC’s working approach to empower the vulnerable groups/communities to hold the governmental authorities accountable through the Cambodian legal and judicial system. CLEC has been noted for its conciliation and mediation to outstanding land and natural resource disputes using all forms of multilateral dialogues/meetings called “Peace Table”. More than 30 cases were solved through this. For the new strategies from 2019, CLEC narrows down its focus to build legal empowerment to vulnerable communities affected by Land Natural Resources issues for access to justice and inclusive development.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fieger Law

19390 West 10 Mile Rd., Southfield, MI, 48075, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Fieger Law has built an international reputation by securing more record-breaking verdicts and settlements than any firm in the country. The firm has also handled high-profile cases, notably Dr. Jack Kevorkian, the Jenny Jones Show trial and the defense of Nathaniel Abraham, who at age 11 was the youngest child ever to be tried for murder in the U.S. as an adult. Many of these cases have set important legal precedents. Today, Fieger Law is the top personal injury firm in the country. People turn to Geoffrey Fieger and the other attorneys at the firm for help when they have been the victims of injustice, medical malpractice or personal injury. Fieger Law. Not Afraid to Win.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fieger-firm.jpeg
Fieger Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fieger Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fieger Law in 2025.

Incident History — Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fieger Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fieger Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-legal-education-center.jpeg
Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fieger-firm.jpeg
Fieger Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fieger Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fieger Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company.

In the current year, Fieger Law company and Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fieger Law company nor Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fieger Law company nor Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fieger Law company nor Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company nor Fieger Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company nor Fieger Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fieger Law company employs more people globally than Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Community Legal Education Center (CLEC) nor Fieger Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X