Comparison Overview

Community Legal Center

VS

Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers

Community Legal Center

80 Monroe Ave., Suite 415, Memphis, Tennessee, 38103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Community Legal Center works daily to ensure access to justice for all, providing legal counsel in basic civil matters to those of limited means and those at risk, including populations not served by other legal aid agencies. We’ve been serving the Memphis and Shelby County community for more than 20 years and invite you to learn more about our services.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers

220 Bay St, Toronto, M5J 2W4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Monkhouse Law is a law firm founded by Toronto Employment Lawyer Andrew Monkhouse. The firm specializes in employment, human resources, long-term disability and employment insurance law. Working for employees, contractors and employers, Monkhouse Law strives to get the optimal results for each client through skilled advocacy and research on each matter. Monkhouse Law prides itself with finding creative solutions to clients’ issues regarding Canadian Employment Law. We will work for you no matter if your case is before the courts, labour arbitration, or the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monkhouse-law.jpeg
Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Community Legal Center
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Legal Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Community Legal Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Legal Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-legal-center.jpeg
Community Legal Center
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monkhouse-law.jpeg
Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Community Legal Center company and Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Community Legal Center company.

In the current year, Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company and Community Legal Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company nor Community Legal Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company nor Community Legal Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company nor Community Legal Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Community Legal Center company nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Community Legal Center company nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers company employs more people globally than Community Legal Center company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Community Legal Center nor Monkhouse Law Employment Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X