Comparison Overview

Community Helps Network

VS

The Guild for Exceptional Children

Community Helps Network

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Community Helps Network is a privately owned agency that initiates, provides and promotes services for people with mental illness and their families within the communities, in order to strengthen their independence, self esteem and ability to participate in and contribute to community life. Try to imagine living with a mental illness. Imagine not being able to have a job…or have a home…or to participate in day-to-day activities, live in your home, or strive in your community. Then imagine someone coming to your side and helping you remove those barriers, creating circles of support that help you to be more independent, that help you participate in the daily living that many take for granted. This is what Community Helps Network is all about. Our Guiding Principles To promote the rights of people we serve. To work collaboratively with families, friends, team members and the community as a whole. To develop relationships with consumers and their families that are based on respect. We are dedicated to providing the supports that are necessary for individuals to achieve their hopes and dreams.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Guild for Exceptional Children

260 68th St, Brooklyn, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Guild for Exceptional Children is a community-based, nonprofit organization that provides educational services, living options, and life skills for children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. We are proud of our six (6) decades of experience keeping families together, stable, and better able to meet the evolving needs of children and adults with special needs. By maximizing the potential of everyone we serve, we promote independence, self-advocacy, and full participation in the community. We offer a variety of person-centered programs and therapies, including clinical, educational, social, vocational, recreational, residential, and support services.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-helps-network.jpeg
Community Helps Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-guild-for-exceptional-children.jpeg
The Guild for Exceptional Children
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Community Helps Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Guild for Exceptional Children
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Helps Network in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Guild for Exceptional Children in 2026.

Incident History — Community Helps Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Helps Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Guild for Exceptional Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Guild for Exceptional Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-helps-network.jpeg
Community Helps Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-guild-for-exceptional-children.jpeg
The Guild for Exceptional Children
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Community Helps Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Guild for Exceptional Children company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Guild for Exceptional Children company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Community Helps Network company.

In the current year, The Guild for Exceptional Children company and Community Helps Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Guild for Exceptional Children company nor Community Helps Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Guild for Exceptional Children company nor Community Helps Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Guild for Exceptional Children company nor Community Helps Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Community Helps Network company nor The Guild for Exceptional Children company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Community Helps Network company nor The Guild for Exceptional Children company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Guild for Exceptional Children company employs more people globally than Community Helps Network company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Community Helps Network nor The Guild for Exceptional Children holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N