Comparison Overview

Community Counseling Center

VS

Onder de Bomen

Community Counseling Center

343 Forest Avenue, Portland, ME, 04101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

With roots dating back to 1874, Community Counseling Center is one of Maine's oldest and most comprehensive private, nonprofit family service agencies, making positive and lasting changes in the lives of 6,000 individuals and families each year through prevention, education, treatment and wellness programs. Community Counseling Center provides a safe haven to individuals and families throughout the entire lifespan and helps them build on their strengths and develop tools to cope with unexpected challenges, such as divorce, substance abuse, parenting a deaf child, readjusting after war, overcoming discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, or caring for an aged parent. Every person who walks through our doors receives the highest quality, evidence-based family services in an environment where everyone is treated with dignity and respect.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 305
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Onder de Bomen

Tweede Oude Heselaan 181a, Nijmegen, 6542, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-14
Between 750 and 799

Onder de Bomen wil een beter toekomstperspectief bieden aan zoveel mogelijk mensen met vernieuwende zorg. We doen dit door zorg te organiseren gericht op eigen regie en groei. Hiervoor bieden we Gesteund Wonen (voor Gezinnen, Jongeren en Volwassenen), Wonen met begeleiding en Dagbesteding. Het draait bij Onder de Bomen om de mens en haar persoonlijke groei. De rest is ondergeschikt. Daarom doen we dingen soms anders. Niet om anders te zijn, maar om het echt om mensen en hun persoonlijke groei te laten draaien. Dat is niet vernieuwend, wij vinden dat vanzelfsprekend. Zo bieden wij een beter toekomstperspectief aan mensen. In de afgelopen jaren zijn we gegroeid van een kleinschalige woonlocatie tot een professionele organisatie met een duidelijke missie: het bieden van MeerWaarde. Voor cliënten, zorgmedewerkers, stakeholders en andere betrokkenen. Onze werkwijze is gebaseerd op vijf kernwaarden: Openheid, Vertrouwen, Durven, Een stap extra zetten en Groei. Deze waarden vormen de basis voor alles wat we doen, elke dag opnieuw.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-counseling-center.jpeg
Community Counseling Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onder-de-bomen.jpeg
Onder de Bomen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Community Counseling Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Onder de Bomen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Counseling Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Onder de Bomen in 2026.

Incident History — Community Counseling Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Counseling Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Onder de Bomen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Onder de Bomen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-counseling-center.jpeg
Community Counseling Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onder-de-bomen.jpeg
Onder de Bomen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Community Counseling Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Onder de Bomen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Onder de Bomen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Community Counseling Center company.

In the current year, Onder de Bomen company and Community Counseling Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Onder de Bomen company nor Community Counseling Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Onder de Bomen company nor Community Counseling Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Onder de Bomen company nor Community Counseling Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Community Counseling Center company nor Onder de Bomen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Community Counseling Center company nor Onder de Bomen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Community Counseling Center company employs more people globally than Onder de Bomen company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Community Counseling Center nor Onder de Bomen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N