Comparison Overview

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

VS

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

24 Beacon Street, Boston, 02133, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mass.gov

Year after year, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has continued to pioneer bold legislative actions and programs, some of which have been embraced on a national scale. We are always looking for talented individuals to help us maintain this momentum and improve the services that millions of people depend on every day. If you’re looking for an innovative work environment where you can really make a difference, check out the job opportunities with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This page is managed according to the Mass.gov social media policy: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgov-social-media-policy. Comments that do not follow our policy may be removed.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,406
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

CA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ontario.ca

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario The Ontario Government works to serve the public interest and uphold the public trust by providing Ministers with objective advice and expert guidance. The Ontario Public Service carries out the decisions and policies of the elected government with integrity and accountability and administers public services to the highest professional standards. Le gouvernement de l’Ontario sert l’intérêt public et conserve la confiance du public en fournissant aux ministres des conseils objectifs et spécialisés. La fonction publique de l’Ontario applique les décisions et les politiques du gouvernement élu. En respectant le principe de reddition des comptes et avec intégrité, elle administre les services à la population selon les normes professionnelles les plus rigoureuses.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 35,796
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-ontario.jpeg
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario in 2026.

Incident History — Commonwealth of Massachusetts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commonwealth of Massachusetts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-ontario.jpeg
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Commonwealth of Massachusetts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Commonwealth of Massachusetts company.

In the current year, Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company and Commonwealth of Massachusetts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts company nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Commonwealth of Massachusetts company.

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company employs more people globally than Commonwealth of Massachusetts company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts nor Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References