Comparison Overview

Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges

VS

Mercy Health Foundation

Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges

None, None, Richmond, VA, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-18

The Commonwealth Alliance's mission is "to provide our member institutions the resources to ensure their students have access to an affordable, value-based education that prepares them for success in a global economy". Since 1965 Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges (formerly known as The Virginia College Fund) has been a reliable, consistent source of financial support for rural "access institutions", providing direct support to students from low to moderate income households, minority students, and students who are the first in their families to attend college. Our member schools are: Appalachian School of Law, Averett University, Bluefield University, Eastern Mennonite University, and Ferrum College. As a statewide consortium well-known for over 50 years, The Commonwealth Alliance has been able to cultivate donors and board members committed to expanding access to higher education. The Commonwealth Alliance's support comes from individuals, corporations, foundations and trusts. Our member schools are located in rural areas of western, southern and southwestern Virginia in the towns of Grundy (Appalachian School of Law), Danville (Averett University), Bluefield (Bluefield University), Harrisonburg (Eastern Mennonite University), and Ferrum (Ferrum College). All are long-established fixtures of their communities, having operated continuously for a century or more. These schools provide employment, invigorate the local economy, and provide a crucial path to economic prosperity for those who attend. Each year, The Commonwealth Alliance divides 100 percent of its funding among the six institutions. The individual college or university will decide the size of each grant based on availability, need and academics. The average financial aid package for our six member schools is over $22,000 per student!

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Mercy Health Foundation

Richmond, Victoria, AU, 3121
Last Update: 2025-12-21

Mercy Health Foundation supports Mercy Health to advance care and improve life outcomes for people in need. Since it was established in 2006, Mercy Health Foundation has worked closely with our many varied donors, including large philanthropic and family donors, corporate partners, event participants, community fundraisers and Mercy Health staff. The Foundation has distributed more than $6 million to a range of essential projects. Among the many initiatives we support, the Foundation has contributed to the Sheila Handbury Chair of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the Mercy Health Breastmilk Bank, innovative equipment in areas such as Special Care Nurseries, sensory gardens for some of Mercy Health’s aged care residents, and aged care research projects. The Foundation operates as a not-for-profit organisation, and is the Trustee for the Mercy Health Foundation Fund. The Foundation is governed by a Board of Directors appointed by Mercy Health and the Institute of Sisters of Mercy of Australia and Papua New Guinea.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-alliance-for-rural-colleges.jpeg
Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercy-health-foundation-aus.jpeg
Mercy Health Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mercy Health Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercy Health Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mercy Health Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercy Health Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-alliance-for-rural-colleges.jpeg
Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercy-health-foundation-aus.jpeg
Mercy Health Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mercy Health Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mercy Health Foundation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mercy Health Foundation company and Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation company nor Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Mercy Health Foundation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mercy Health Foundation company nor Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company nor Mercy Health Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company nor Mercy Health Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mercy Health Foundation company employs more people globally than Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Commonwealth Alliance for Rural Colleges nor Mercy Health Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N