Comparison Overview

CommonSpirit Health

VS

City of Hope

CommonSpirit Health

444 W Lake St, Chicago, 60606-0097, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.commonspirit.careers

Inspired by faith. Driven by innovation. Powered by humankindness. CommonSpirit Health is building a healthier future for all through its integrated health services. As one of the nation’s largest nonprofit Catholic healthcare organizations, CommonSpirit Health delivers more than 20 million patient encounters annually through more than 2,300 clinics, care sites and 138 hospital-based locations, in addition to its home-based services and virtual care offerings. CommonSpirit has more than 160,000 employees, 45,000 nurses and 25,000 physicians and advanced practice providers across 24 states and contributes more than $5 billion annually in charity care, community benefits, and unreimbursed government programs. Together with our patients, physicians, partners, and communities, we are creating a more just, equitable, and innovative healthcare delivery system. Learn more at commonspirit.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 45,793
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3
View Profile

City of Hope

1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, US, 91010
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 700 and 749
https://http://www.cityofhope.org

City of Hope's mission is to deliver the cures of tomorrow to the people who need them today. Founded in 1913, City of Hope has grown into one of the largest cancer research and treatment organizations in the U.S. and one of the leading research centers for diabetes and other life-threatening illnesses. City of Hope research has been the basis for numerous breakthrough cancer medicines, as well as human synthetic insulin and monoclonal antibodies. With an independent, National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center at its core, City of Hope brings a uniquely integrated model to patients spanning cancer care, research and development, academics and training, and innovation initiatives. City of Hope’s growing national system includes its Los Angeles campus, a network of clinical care locations across Southern California, a new cancer center in Orange County, California, and treatment facilities in Atlanta, Chicago and Phoenix. City of Hope’s affiliated group of organizations includes Translational Genomics Research Institute and AccessHope™.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,182
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonspirithealth.jpeg
CommonSpirit Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hope.jpeg
City of Hope
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CommonSpirit Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Hope
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CommonSpirit Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Hope in 2026.

Incident History — CommonSpirit Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CommonSpirit Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Hope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Hope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonspirithealth.jpeg
CommonSpirit Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hope.jpeg
City of Hope
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CommonSpirit Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Hope company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CommonSpirit Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to City of Hope company.

In the current year, City of Hope company and CommonSpirit Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Hope company nor CommonSpirit Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both City of Hope company and CommonSpirit Health company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both City of Hope company and CommonSpirit Health company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither CommonSpirit Health company nor City of Hope company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CommonSpirit Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Hope company.

CommonSpirit Health company employs more people globally than City of Hope company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CommonSpirit Health nor City of Hope holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References