Comparison Overview

Common Ground Research Networks

VS

Recharge

Common Ground Research Networks

2001 S 1st St, Champaign, 61820, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since 1984, Common Ground Research Networks (Not-for-Profit) has been committed to the principles of access, participation, and equality through conference curation and journal publication. Common Ground Research Networks takes some of the most pivotal challenges of our time, and curates networks that apply interdisciplinary thinking, global conversations, and cross-institutional intellectual collaborations to achieve solutions. Discover more information on this not-for-profit corporation and the community it has built today.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Recharge

125 Wood Street, London, undefined, EC2V 7AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

RECHARGE is the world’s leading provider of business intelligence for the renewable-energy industries, combining award-winning international coverage of breaking news, in-depth features and analysis that, through a digital online platform and bimonthly magazine, deliver depth and dimension on the stories that matter most to the wind and solar sectors. Founded in 2009 by Norway's NHST Media Group, Recharge has offices in the UK, Norway, Germany, Japan, Brazil and the US. Website: www.rechargenews.com

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/common-ground-research-networks.jpeg
Common Ground Research Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recharge-newspaper.jpeg
Recharge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Common Ground Research Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Recharge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Common Ground Research Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Recharge in 2025.

Incident History — Common Ground Research Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Common Ground Research Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Recharge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Recharge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/common-ground-research-networks.jpeg
Common Ground Research Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recharge-newspaper.jpeg
Recharge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Common Ground Research Networks company and Recharge company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Recharge company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Common Ground Research Networks company.

In the current year, Recharge company and Common Ground Research Networks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Recharge company nor Common Ground Research Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Recharge company nor Common Ground Research Networks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Recharge company nor Common Ground Research Networks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks company nor Recharge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks company nor Recharge company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Common Ground Research Networks company employs more people globally than Recharge company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Common Ground Research Networks nor Recharge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.