Comparison Overview

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

VS

Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://crfb.org/

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget is a bipartisan, non-profit organization committed to educating the public about issues that have significant fiscal policy impact. The Committee is made up of some of the nation's leading budget experts including many of the past Chairmen and Directors of the Budget Committees, the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget, the Government Accountability Office, and the Federal Reserve Board. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/BudgetHawks Follow us on Twitter (@BudgetHawks) https://twitter.com/#!/BudgetHawks

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies

633 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749
http://jointcenter.org/

The Joint Center was founded in 1970 as the Black think tank. Today, the Joint Center remains anchored in the Black community and collaborates closely with organizations from other communities, like the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials. We focus on the impact of automation, artificial intelligence, and other innovations on the future of work, economic development, and quality of life in communities of color. We also work to increase diversity among staff in Congress.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jointcenter.jpeg
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in 2025.

Incident History — Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jointcenter.jpeg
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company.

In the current year, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company and Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company employs more people globally than Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget nor Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References