Comparison Overview

Commission des services électriques de Montréal

VS

Entergy

Commission des services électriques de Montréal

Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Depuis 1910, la Commission des services électriques de Montréal (CSEM) s’emploie à promouvoir et à favoriser l’enfouissement des réseaux câblés sur tout le territoire de la ville. Pour ce faire, elle agit comme mandataire exclusif de la Ville de Montréal. Hydro-Québec est son plus important partenaire et elle dessert également de nombreuses organisations en matière de distribution d'énergie et de télécommunications. La CSEM coordonne les efforts de tous les intervenants afin d’offrir un réseau d’infrastructures fiable, sécuritaire et durable, et ce, tant au niveau souterrain qu’au niveau aérien. Au total, depuis sa création, la Commission des services électriques a développé un réseau souterrain qui s’étend sous toute l’île de Montréal ; ce qui représente 27,084 km de conduits, plus de 25 263 structures (20 176 puits d’accès et 2777 chambres de transformation) et 45 000 raccordements. La CSEM intervient également sur tous les projets de raccordement aux différents immeubles et bâtiments. La Commission des services électriques de Montréal demeure à ce jour le seul organisme public du genre au Canada.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Entergy

639 Loyola Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70113, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 800 and 849

At Entergy (NYSE: ETR), we power life. More than 100 years ago, our founder Harvey Couch started this company with a handshake, some sawdust and a vision. Couch wanted to bring safe, affordable, reliable energy to the Middle South – energy that would power the lives of people and communities. Today, we own and operate one of the cleanest large-scale U.S. power generating fleets including more than five gigawatts of carbon-free nuclear capacity, a fleet of highly efficient gas resources, and a fast-growing portfolio of renewable resources. The nearly 12,000 men and women of Entergy deliver electricity and gas services to 3 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, generating annual GAAP revenues of $13.8 billion. Headquartered in New Orleans, we continue to play a driving role in the economic growth of the Gulf South. Our work matters. That’s been true for more than 100 years. And as we look to the next century, we remember the constant that bridges our past and future: We Power Life. Fast Facts: Entergy currently has a 90% rating on the 2022 Corporate Equality Index released by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. This score places Entergy among the top energy and utility companies in the survey. With roots in the Gulf South region for more than a century, Entergy is a recognized leader in corporate citizenship, delivering more than $100 million in economic benefits to local communities through philanthropy and advocacy efforts annually over the last several years. With a total of 44 awards from EEI for its restoration and mutual-assistance work, Entergy remains the only utility company to have won either EEI's Recovery or Assistance Award, or both, every year since the awards began in 1998.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 11,655
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commission-des-services-electriques-de-montreal.jpeg
Commission des services électriques de Montréal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/entergy.jpeg
Entergy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Commission des services électriques de Montréal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Entergy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commission des services électriques de Montréal in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Entergy in 2025.

Incident History — Commission des services électriques de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commission des services électriques de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Entergy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Entergy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commission-des-services-electriques-de-montreal.jpeg
Commission des services électriques de Montréal
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/entergy.jpeg
Entergy
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2016
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Entergy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Commission des services électriques de Montréal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Commission des services électriques de Montréal and Entergy have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Entergy company and Commission des services électriques de Montréal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Entergy company nor Commission des services électriques de Montréal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Commission des services électriques de Montréal company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Entergy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Entergy company nor Commission des services électriques de Montréal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal company nor Entergy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal company nor Entergy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Entergy company employs more people globally than Commission des services électriques de Montréal company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Commission des services électriques de Montréal nor Entergy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X