Comparison Overview

Commerzbank AG

VS

Rupali Bank Limited

Commerzbank AG

KaiserstraรŸe 16, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, 60311, DE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Commerzbank is the leading bank for the German Mittelstand and a strong partner for around 25,500 corporate client groups. In addition, it supports private and small-business customers in Germany with more than โ‚ฌ400 billion assets under management. The Bankโ€™s two Business Segments โ€“ Private and Small-Business Customers and Corporate Clients โ€“ offer a comprehensive portfolio of financial services. Commerzbank transacts approximately 30% of Germanyโ€™s foreign trade and is present internationally in more than 40 countries in the corporate clientsโ€™ business. The Bank focusses on the German Mittelstand, large corporates, and institutional clients. As part of its international business, Commerzbank supports clients with a business relationship to Germany, Austria, or Switzerland and companies operating in selected future-oriented industries. In the Private and Small-Business Customers segment, the Bank is at the side of its customers with its brands Commerzbank and comdirect: online and mobile, in the advisory centre, and personally in its branches. Its Polish subsidiary mBank S.A. is an innovative digital bank that serves approximately 5.7 million private and corporate customers, predominantly in Poland, as well as in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,930
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rupali Bank Limited

34, Dilkusha C/A Dhaka, BD
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Rupali Bank (Bengali: เฆฐเง‚เฆชเฆพเฆฒเง€ เฆฌเงเฆฏเฆพเฆ‚เฆ•) is a commercial bank in Bangladesh. It was established as a nationalised bank in 1972 under the Bangladesh Banks Nationalisation Order, through the amalgamation of the branches of Muslim Commercial Bank, Australasia Bank and Standard Bank that were operating in East Pakistan, following the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. The bank was denationalised in 1986, and reorganised as a limited company, with the Government of Bangladesh holding 51% shares. However, after the year 2000, the Government divested of its shares, and the privatization of the bank was complete.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commerzbank-ag.jpeg
Commerzbank AG
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rupali-bank-limited.jpeg
Rupali Bank Limited
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Commerzbank AG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rupali Bank Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commerzbank AG in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rupali Bank Limited in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Commerzbank AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commerzbank AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Rupali Bank Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rupali Bank Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commerzbank-ag.jpeg
Commerzbank AG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rupali-bank-limited.jpeg
Rupali Bank Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Commerzbank AG company and Rupali Bank Limited company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rupali Bank Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Commerzbank AG company.

In the current year, Rupali Bank Limited company and Commerzbank AG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rupali Bank Limited company nor Commerzbank AG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rupali Bank Limited company nor Commerzbank AG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rupali Bank Limited company nor Commerzbank AG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commerzbank AG company nor Rupali Bank Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commerzbank AG company nor Rupali Bank Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Commerzbank AG company employs more people globally than Rupali Bank Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.