Comparison Overview

Commercial Mechanical Systems

VS

Springfort Precision Engineering

Commercial Mechanical Systems

5410 Old Poole Road, Raleigh, 27610, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Commercial Mechanical Systems offers the latest in technology and the highest quality of service, specializing in HVAC, Mechanical Service and Direct Digital Control Systems for commercial, industrial, healthcare, educational and institutional facilities. Contact us and allow our three specialized operating divisions to provide you with a state of the art environmental solution that will enable you to reduce your energy and operating costs and improve your indoor environment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Springfort Precision Engineering

Unit 6, Carn Business Park, Carn Road, Portadown, Craigavon, Co.Armagh, BT63 5WG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Springfort Precision Engineering, we pride ourselves on our exceptional capability to deliver high-quality CNC Manufacturing in a wide range of materials including aluminium, brass, mild steel, stainless steel, and engineering plastics. As an AS9100 & ISO9001 accredited company, we specialise in advanced multi-axis CNC machining, offering bespoke engineering solutions at competitive prices. Utilising the latest CNC machine tools and technology, our highly skilled team is committed to precision and excellence.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commercial-mechanical-systems.jpeg
Commercial Mechanical Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfort-precision-engineering.jpeg
Springfort Precision Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Commercial Mechanical Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Springfort Precision Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commercial Mechanical Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springfort Precision Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Commercial Mechanical Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commercial Mechanical Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Springfort Precision Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springfort Precision Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commercial-mechanical-systems.jpeg
Commercial Mechanical Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfort-precision-engineering.jpeg
Springfort Precision Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Commercial Mechanical Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Springfort Precision Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Springfort Precision Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Commercial Mechanical Systems company.

In the current year, Springfort Precision Engineering company and Commercial Mechanical Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Springfort Precision Engineering company nor Commercial Mechanical Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Springfort Precision Engineering company nor Commercial Mechanical Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Springfort Precision Engineering company nor Commercial Mechanical Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems company nor Springfort Precision Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems company nor Springfort Precision Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Commercial Mechanical Systems company employs more people globally than Springfort Precision Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Commercial Mechanical Systems nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H