Comparison Overview

Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc.

VS

Fluke Process Instruments

Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc.

618 Washington Street, East Walpole, MA, 02032, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company has the gear machining experience you need. Our third generation family owned company has been producing quality gears and other power transmission products at competitive prices since 1946 (over 60 years). With a customer list that represents many industries, we supply custom products to such businesses as machine tool builders, construction equipment and power hand tool suppliers, medical equipment providers and defense suppliers. We will be proud to serve your business as well. We compete favorably with stock gear houses for standard gears. We can be your source for the largest selection of stock and custom manufactured chains and sprockets. Our service is unmatched: We meet the needs of each customer, tailoring our capabilities to your individual needs, and we deliver on time every time. Commercial Gear's machinists, some with over 30 years experience, ensure that your job is produced to your specifications the first time.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fluke Process Instruments

Last Update: 2025-11-26

Raytek, Ircon, Datapaq - Together, we are Fluke Process Instruments, advancing the reputation of the worldwide leader in measurement tools by offering a broad portfolio of noncontact temperature measurement and profiling solutions for today’s most demanding environments. With over 150 years combined experience in developing innovative products that improve product quality and reduce waste, our team is committed to achieving new advancements that will benefit our customers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commercial-gear-&-sprocket-company-inc-.jpeg
Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flukepi.jpeg
Fluke Process Instruments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fluke Process Instruments
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fluke Process Instruments in 2025.

Incident History — Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fluke Process Instruments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fluke Process Instruments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commercial-gear-&-sprocket-company-inc-.jpeg
Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flukepi.jpeg
Fluke Process Instruments
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fluke Process Instruments company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fluke Process Instruments company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fluke Process Instruments company and Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fluke Process Instruments company nor Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fluke Process Instruments company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fluke Process Instruments company nor Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company nor Fluke Process Instruments company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fluke Process Instruments company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company.

Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than Fluke Process Instruments company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Commercial Gear & Sprocket Company, Inc. nor Fluke Process Instruments holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H