Comparison Overview

Commerce Controls

VS

Fallas Automation

Commerce Controls

41069 Vincenti Ct, Novi, Michigan, 48375-1923, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Commerce Controls Incorporated (CCI) is a leading provider of turn-key solutions for control systems in automotive, water and wastewater, and industrial applications. Today, CCI is part of the Kaiser Enterprise. The Kaiser Enterprise includes, Gallagher-Kaiser (GK), GK de Mexico, GK Canada, GK GmbH Germany, Universal Piping Industries (UPI), Tann Corporation, Kais-AIR®, Commerce Controls Incorporated (CCI), Ventcon Incorporated, Rival Insulation, Kaiser Industrial and Universal Fire Protection (UFP). Together, this team serves a variety of customers in a wide array of markets. From automotive paint finishing to municipal water treatment markets, CCI has the expertise to provide automation & control systems for industrial processing applications.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fallas Automation

7000 Imperial Dr, Waco, TX 76712, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Fallas Automation is a case packaging equipment builder with the goal to make and deliver, on schedule, the best case packing machinery in terms of quality and value as perceived by our customers. We provide full systems from infeed conveyors to case sealers. That way you know you are getting a system that works. For over 40 years we've listened to your requirements for simple compact, lower-cost case packers and equipment. Here is the result: The kind of machines you'd build yourself if you had the time and resources

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commerce-controls-inc.jpeg
Commerce Controls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallas-automation.jpeg
Fallas Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Commerce Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fallas Automation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commerce Controls in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fallas Automation in 2025.

Incident History — Commerce Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commerce Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fallas Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fallas Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commerce-controls-inc.jpeg
Commerce Controls
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fallas-automation.jpeg
Fallas Automation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Commerce Controls company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fallas Automation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fallas Automation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Commerce Controls company.

In the current year, Fallas Automation company and Commerce Controls company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Commerce Controls company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Commerce Controls company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fallas Automation company nor Commerce Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Commerce Controls company nor Fallas Automation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Commerce Controls company nor Fallas Automation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Commerce Controls company employs more people globally than Fallas Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Commerce Controls nor Fallas Automation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H