Comparison Overview

ComfortZone

VS

Intex Technologies

ComfortZone

улица Вячеслава Чёрновола, № 27, Киев, 01135, UA
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Сomfortzone - это современная модель производства и продажи качественной офисной мебели, основанная на индивидуальном подходе. Сomfortzone - молодая и амбициозная компания состоящая из профессионалов с многолетним опытом работы и четким пониманием тенденций современного мира мебели. Мы стремимся к совершенствованию наших товаров, сервиса, услуг и человеческих отношений. Порядок на рабочем месте - порядок в голове - это наш приоритет. Мы создаем хорошую рабочую атмосферу в вашем офисе, обеспечивая сотрудников качественной мебелью и всеми необходимыми аксессуарами.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Intex Technologies

3133 Highland Dr, None, Hudsonville, MI, US, 49426
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded in May of 2008, Intex Technologies has established itself as a leader and innovator in the integral skin urethane process, supplying products to industry leaders in office seating, consumer, medical and toy industries. Intex has the ability for rapid prototyping in the production setting, providing innovative and cost efficient sample of all types. Intex is committed to providing green solutions in the urethane market and has developed a proprietary formulation integral skin system that meets the requirement for the MBDC cradle to grave ratings in conjunction with the California Technical bulletin 117 flammability. Intex can provide a cost competitive alternative to offshore sourcing and is a registered Minority Business Enterprise.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comfortzone.jpeg
ComfortZone
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intex-technologies-llc..jpeg
Intex Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ComfortZone
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intex Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ComfortZone in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intex Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — ComfortZone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ComfortZone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intex Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intex Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comfortzone.jpeg
ComfortZone
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intex-technologies-llc..jpeg
Intex Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ComfortZone company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intex Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Intex Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ComfortZone company.

In the current year, Intex Technologies company and ComfortZone company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Intex Technologies company nor ComfortZone company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Intex Technologies company nor ComfortZone company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Intex Technologies company nor ComfortZone company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ComfortZone company nor Intex Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ComfortZone company nor Intex Technologies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Intex Technologies company employs more people globally than ComfortZone company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ComfortZone nor Intex Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.