Comparison Overview

Comerica Bank

VS

DenizBank

Comerica Bank

1717 Main Street, Dallas, TX, US, 75201
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Comerica Incorporated (NYSE: CMA) is a financial services company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, strategically aligned by the Business Bank, the Retail Bank, and Wealth Management. The Business Bank provides companies of all sizes with an array of credit and non-credit financial products and services. The Retail Bank delivers personalized financial products and services to consumers. Wealth Management serves the needs of high net worth clients and institutions. Comerica’s approximately 8,000 colleagues focus on relationships, and helping people and businesses be successful. Comerica operates in seven of the 10 largest U.S. cities, with more than 430 banking centers in its primary markets of Texas, Arizona, California, Florida and Michigan. Select businesses operate in several other states, as well as in Canada and Mexico. Comerica is among the 25 largest U.S. banking companies. Visit Comerica's Facebook page at facebook.com/Comerica or on Twitter at @ComericaBank for more information on how Comerica is making a positive difference in the communities it serves. To learn more about Comerica’s products, services and career opportunities, visit Comerica.com.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,077
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DenizBank

Büyükdere Caddesi 141, Esentepe, Istanbul, TR, 34394
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

In 1997, DenizBank was acquired by the Zorlu Holding in the form of a banking license from the Privatization Administration. Undergoing three shareholder changes and done public offering in its short history, the Bank was acquired in October 2006 by Dexia, one of the leading financial groups of Europe. Later on, being subject to the biggest one-time investment made by Russia in Turkey, DenizBank started to serve under the umbrella of Sberbank, one of the biggest banks in the world, as of September 28, 2012. Finally, the Bank’s shares were transferred to Emirates NBD as of August 2019, again one of the leading institutions in its region.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,943
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comerica-bank.jpeg
Comerica Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denizbank.jpeg
DenizBank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Comerica Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DenizBank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comerica Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DenizBank in 2025.

Incident History — Comerica Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comerica Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DenizBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DenizBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comerica-bank.jpeg
Comerica Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denizbank.jpeg
DenizBank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Comerica Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DenizBank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DenizBank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Comerica Bank company.

In the current year, DenizBank company and Comerica Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DenizBank company nor Comerica Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DenizBank company nor Comerica Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DenizBank company nor Comerica Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Comerica Bank company nor DenizBank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Comerica Bank company nor DenizBank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Comerica Bank company employs more people globally than DenizBank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Comerica Bank nor DenizBank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N