Comparison Overview

Comerford & Dougherty, LLP

VS

Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC

Comerford & Dougherty, LLP

1122 Franklin Avenue, Garden City, NY, 11530, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1997, Comerford & Dougherty, LLP is a full-service law firm serving Long Island and the greater metropolitan New York area. The employees at Comerford & Dougherty are dedicated to combining personalized attention to the needs of their clients with the knowledge from experience in a wide range of legal fields.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC

900 S. Gay Street, Knoxville, TN, 37902, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Woolf McClane is a Knoxville, Tennessee law firm with a strong East Tennessee practice. In addition, we represent clients all across the Southeast and throughout the rest of the United States. Woolf McClane has 33 lawyers divided between the firm’s Business Section and Litigation Section. From tax law to toxic torts, and most areas of law in between, Woolf McClane has the attorneys to be a full service law firm for you and your business. Our Business Section attorneys represent individuals and small and large businesses with various types of transactions, such as mergers and acquisitions, commercial financing and real estate. Woolf McClane has six attorneys (including five LL.M.s in tax law) who make up the tax and estate planning practice of the firm. The Business Section at Woolf McClane also has experience in a wide variety of other areas, such as asset protection, business organizations, e-commerce, contracts, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, employment practices, health care, landlord and tenant, probate, and tax exempt organizations. The firm’s Litigation Section has a regional and national presence in the practice areas of toxic torts, environmental litigation, and products liability. The attorneys in our Litigation Section also represent clients locally, focusing on such areas as bankruptcy and creditors’ rights, class actions, commercial disputes, construction and surety matters, employment litigation, personal injury, and tax litigation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comerford-&-dougherty-llp.jpeg
Comerford & Dougherty, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woolf-mcclane-bright-allen-&-carpenter-pllc.jpeg
Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Comerford & Dougherty, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comerford & Dougherty, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Comerford & Dougherty, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comerford & Dougherty, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comerford-&-dougherty-llp.jpeg
Comerford & Dougherty, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woolf-mcclane-bright-allen-&-carpenter-pllc.jpeg
Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company and Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company.

In the current year, Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company and Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company nor Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company nor Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company nor Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC company employs more people globally than Comerford & Dougherty, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Comerford & Dougherty, LLP nor Woolf, McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X