Comparison Overview

Comega

VS

InfrastructurePhotos

Comega

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.comega.nl

Communicatie. Voor veel ondernemers een redelijk vaag begrip. Bij de begrippen reclame of marketing gaan er vaak al meer bellen rinkelen. Toch vallen reclame en marketing ook onder uw communicatiebeleid. Comega verzorgt strategisch communicatieadvies voor het MKB. Strategisch, omdat de volgorde van de stappen die u zet, van groot belang is voor het effect dat u bereikt. De stappen van een strategisch communicatieplan kunt u hiernaast bekijken. Wat is uw identiteit? Klopt dit met het beeld dat de klant van u heeft (uw imago)? Welke media gebruikt uw doelgroep om informatie in te winnen over uw product en maakt u wel reclame via deze media? Als dit alles op de rit staat, gaan we pas kijken naar de middelen die u kunt inzetten om uw bedrijf op de kaart te zetten. U heeft uw basis al voor elkaar? Ook voor andere vraagstukken zoals het opzetten van een personeelswervingscampagne, communicatieadvies bij veranderingen in uw organisatie of het opzetten van een public relations beleid, kunt u bij Comega terecht.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

InfrastructurePhotos

Johannesburg, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.infrastructurephotos.com

InfrastructurePhotos provides high quality infrastructure photography services for the Built Environment (architecture, commercial, industrial, infrastructure, healthcare, education, hospitality and energy) to serve as a permanent image record of all of your projects. 15 years of local and international exposure to the architectural and engineering sectors, along with a comprehensive technical understanding of design plays a significant role in our approach to capturing the design intent and emotional contribution of infrastructure. Our approach captures all stages of construction progress in line with relevant work stages, from inception to project completion. Would-be valuable photographic evidence and valuable information are often ruined due to out-of-focus, poorly lit or poor quality images. Our use of state of the art equipment and technology contributes to our sublime quality and relevant photography.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comega.jpeg
Comega
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infrastructurephotos.jpeg
InfrastructurePhotos
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Comega
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
InfrastructurePhotos
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comega in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InfrastructurePhotos in 2025.

Incident History — Comega (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comega cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — InfrastructurePhotos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InfrastructurePhotos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comega.jpeg
Comega
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infrastructurephotos.jpeg
InfrastructurePhotos
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

InfrastructurePhotos company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Comega company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, InfrastructurePhotos company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Comega company.

In the current year, InfrastructurePhotos company and Comega company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither InfrastructurePhotos company nor Comega company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither InfrastructurePhotos company nor Comega company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither InfrastructurePhotos company nor Comega company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Comega company nor InfrastructurePhotos company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Comega company nor InfrastructurePhotos company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

InfrastructurePhotos company employs more people globally than Comega company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Comega nor InfrastructurePhotos holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References