Comparison Overview

Comdec, Inc.

VS

K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit

Comdec, Inc.

25 Hale Street, Newburyport, MA, 01950, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Your Full Service Solution for Commercial Printing Comdec, Inc. · Ruco USA · Standard Machines, Inc. · Digitran, Inc. 30 years of experience in screen printing, pad printing, commercial decorating, methods and materials, means your job is done right, on time, and within budget. And our in-depth knowledge of every process we offer means we solve problems before they can affect your project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit

3123 W. MacArthur Blvd, Santa Ana, CA, 92704, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

K Laser Technology USA (www.coldfoil.com) is a global manufacturer of cold foil products and cold foil adhesives. Vice President J. Michael Rivera debuted the commercial use of cold foil at LabelExpo Americas 2000 trade show in Chicago, Illinois. For over 20 years, our company has been dedicated to manufacturing and promoting high-quality holograms as the best packaging and authentication solutions. We stay in the forefront of creative holographic ideas, offering a full array of holographic products to meet our customer’s security, authentication and marketing objectives. With manufacturing and warehousing capacity in Santa Ana, California and Sarasota, Florida, our customers are provided with local inventory and fast production turnaround time. Presently, we are one of 21 international production and sales offices worldwide. K Laser USA strives to be the premier supplier of cold foil materials, leader in customer service and provide an unparalleled technical support to nurture a loyal customer following. We continue to develop innovative decorative materials to help printers meet their customer demands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comdec-inc..jpeg
Comdec, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klaserusa.jpeg
K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Comdec, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comdec, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit in 2025.

Incident History — Comdec, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comdec, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comdec-inc..jpeg
Comdec, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klaserusa.jpeg
K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Comdec, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Comdec, Inc. company.

In the current year, K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company and Comdec, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company nor Comdec, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company nor Comdec, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company nor Comdec, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Comdec, Inc. company nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Comdec, Inc. company nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit company employs more people globally than Comdec, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Comdec, Inc. nor K LASER TECHNOLOGY Cold Foil Business Unit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N