Comcast Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (COM4835348112525)
The Rankiteo video explains how the company Comcast has been impacted by a Breach on the date August 01, 2024.
Incident Summary
If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.
Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Comcast's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteoโs incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Comcast Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteoโs MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Comcast breach identified under incident ID COM4835348112525.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Comcast's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/comcast, the number of followers: 706769, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 60212 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 422 and after the incident was 359 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Comcast and their customers.
Comcast Corporation recently reported "Comcast Data Breach via Vendor FBCS Leading to $1.5M FCC Fine", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Comcast Corporation was fined $1.5 million by the FCC after its vendor, Financial Business and Consumer Solutions (FBCS), exposed the personal data of ~237,000 current and former customers (internet, TV, and home security services).
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data of ~237,000 customers, with nearly 237,000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $1.5 million (FCC fine).
In response, and began remediation that includes Compliance plan with strengthened vendor oversight and customer-privacy safeguards.
The case underscores how Resolved (settlement reached).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including vendor, Financial Business and Consumer Solutions (FBCS), exposed the personal data, and data Breach (Third-Party Vendor). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (85%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and exposed the personal data of ~237,000 customers and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating vendor (FBCS) security failure implied automated/data-processing exposure. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating fBCS went bankrupt before disclosing the breach (potential data loss) and Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft risk such as High (personal data exposed). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating vendor (FBCS) security failure (possible misuse of legitimate access) and Disable or Modify Tools: Impair Defenses (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating lack of oversight (implied inadequate security controls). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (65%), supported by evidence indicating vendor security failure (implied poor credential storage/practices). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources
- Comcast Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: http://www.rankiteo.com/company/comcast/incident/COM4835348112525
- Comcast CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/comcast
- Comcast Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/com4835348112525-comcast-corporation-breach-august-2024/
- Comcast CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/comcast/history
- Comcast CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.benzinga.com/news/legal/25/11/49050513/comcast-to-pay-1-5-million-fcc-fine-over-vendor-data-breach-exposing-more-than-230000-accounts
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/static/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/static/Rankiteo%20Cybersecurity%20Rating%20Model.pdf





