Comparison Overview

Combined Technologies Group Inc.

VS

Weintek

Combined Technologies Group Inc.

undefined, Dayton, ohio, 45414, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Combined Technologies Group is a Robotic Automation and Special Machine Integrator servicing the Die Casting sector. As a Turnkey Systems provider, we follow your project from concept to the installation and production startup. By offering a full line of trim presses and degate saw machines, extraction, spray, ladle, part palletizing, vision, quality control and inspection robotic applications; we can handle your smallest to largest projects from concept to completion.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Weintek

14F., No. 11, Qiaohe Road, , Zhonghe District, 235029, TW
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1995, Weintek has committed itself to designing high-performance HMI products. The company defined industrial standards by manufacturing the unprecedented full color 7" and 10" 16:9 touchscreen HMI products, which still serve as the foundation for worldwide factory automation today. Weintek’s cMT series perfectly integrates HMI, wireless tablets, and Panel PC, offering users the ultimate operator interface experience. ‧Follow us on Weintek's forum: http://forum.weintek.com/ ‧Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/weintekfans ‧Tweet us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/weintekfans ‧Watch us on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/WeintekCOM ‧Connect us on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/weintek/career

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/combined-technologies-group-inc..jpeg
Combined Technologies Group Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weintek.jpeg
Weintek
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Combined Technologies Group Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Weintek
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Combined Technologies Group Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weintek in 2025.

Incident History — Combined Technologies Group Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Combined Technologies Group Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Weintek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weintek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/combined-technologies-group-inc..jpeg
Combined Technologies Group Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weintek.jpeg
Weintek
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Combined Technologies Group Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Weintek company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Weintek company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Combined Technologies Group Inc. company.

In the current year, Weintek company and Combined Technologies Group Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Weintek company nor Combined Technologies Group Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Weintek company nor Combined Technologies Group Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Weintek company nor Combined Technologies Group Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. company nor Weintek company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. company nor Weintek company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Weintek company employs more people globally than Combined Technologies Group Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Group Inc. nor Weintek holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H