Comparison Overview

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)

VS

Clary Corp

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)

Ground Floor, 21 Home Strait, Te Rapa, Hamilton, Waikato, NZ, 3200
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Combined Technologies (CTEK) is a leading company in the field of Industrial Automation, Control Systems Integration and Reporting Systems for many diverse industries including Dairy, Food and Beverage, Mining, Paper and Pulp etc. throughout New Zealand and Australia. Our Engineers are based within our Hamilton and Auckland office, our clients'​ offices throughout New Zealand and are responsible for designing, installing, and maintaining large scale automation systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clary Corp

150 E Huntington Drive, Monrovia, California, 91016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Clary traffic, instrumentation and military uninterrupted power supply systems offer the most progressive and reliable power protection your applications. Clary systems deliver a digitally controlled and precise regenerated output sinewave, and provide reliable power during events such as brownouts, dirty unstable power and loss of input power. Our systems are proven to perform in some of the world's harshest environments, including temperatures from -40°C to +74°C. You can count on Clary for outdoor applications in locations from the hottest desert to the coldest tundra.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/combined-technoligies.jpeg
Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clary-corp.jpeg
Clary Corp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clary Corp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clary Corp in 2025.

Incident History — Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clary Corp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clary Corp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/combined-technoligies.jpeg
Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clary-corp.jpeg
Clary Corp
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clary Corp company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clary Corp company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company.

In the current year, Clary Corp company and Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clary Corp company nor Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clary Corp company nor Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clary Corp company nor Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company nor Clary Corp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company nor Clary Corp company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company employs more people globally than Clary Corp company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Clary Corp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H