Comparison Overview

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)

VS

Advantech

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)

Ground Floor, 21 Home Strait, Te Rapa, Hamilton, Waikato, NZ, 3200
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Combined Technologies (CTEK) is a leading company in the field of Industrial Automation, Control Systems Integration and Reporting Systems for many diverse industries including Dairy, Food and Beverage, Mining, Paper and Pulp etc. throughout New Zealand and Australia. Our Engineers are based within our Hamilton and Auckland office, our clients'​ offices throughout New Zealand and are responsible for designing, installing, and maintaining large scale automation systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advantech

No. 1, Alley 20, Lane 26, Rueiguang Road, Neihu District, Taipei 114, Taiwan, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1983, Advantech is a leader in providing trusted, innovative products, services, and solutions. Advantech offers comprehensive system integration, hardware, software, customer-centric design services, embedded systems, automation products, and global logistics support. We cooperate closely with our partners to help provide complete solutions for a wide array of applications across a diverse range of industries. Our mission is to enable an intelligent planet with Automation and Embedded Computing products and solutions that empower the development of smarter working and living. With Advantech, there is no limit to the applications and innovations our products make possible. (Corporate Website: www.advantech.com).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3,398
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/combined-technoligies.jpeg
Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantech.jpeg
Advantech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advantech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advantech in 2025.

Incident History — Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advantech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advantech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/combined-technoligies.jpeg
Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantech.jpeg
Advantech
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advantech company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Advantech company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Advantech company and Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Advantech company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Advantech company nor Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advantech company nor Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company nor Advantech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Advantech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company.

Advantech company employs more people globally than Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Combined Technologies Limited (CTEK) nor Advantech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H