Comparison Overview

Comark Direct

VS

Thomco

Comark Direct

3305 Wiley Post, Carrollton, Texas, 75006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since 1971, Comark Direct has been Fort Worth’s service and manufacturing pioneer. Today, Comark has grown from a single location local print shop to a multi-plant, print, design, fulfillment and technology company with global reach. We all know that the world is changing quickly, and Comark Direct is leading the charge with powerful program management and analytical business intelligence services customized to help our clients thrive. Combining our best-in-class technology with quick and efficient manufacturing processes gives our service team the tools they need to deliver for our customers. As a direct in-house manufacturer, Comark Direct utilizes cutting edge print and software technologies to produce beautiful on-brand materials to reach and communicate with our client’s audience. Communication results are the name of the game and Comark Direct is ready to help you win!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thomco

1100 Northbrook Parkway, Suwanee, GA, 30024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

At Thomco, solutions are our business, whether you need adhesives, tapes, graphic films, converted products or custom labels. We are an ISO 9001 and ISO/TS 16949 Registered 3M Preferred Converter and Specialty Industrial Distributor, serving a wide range of customers in multiple industries throughout the United States and in over 10 countries internationally. Our experienced team of engineers, production experts, sales and customer service professionals can also provide customized solutions for die-cut components and printed labels. Along with manufacturing, we can assist you with design, development, prototypes and testing. If you’re looking for a partner who is precise, takes pride in their work, delivers on time, and produces consistent quality, Thomco is the answer for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comark-direct.jpeg
Comark Direct
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomco-specialty-products-inc-.jpeg
Thomco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Comark Direct
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thomco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comark Direct in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomco in 2025.

Incident History — Comark Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comark Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thomco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comark-direct.jpeg
Comark Direct
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomco-specialty-products-inc-.jpeg
Thomco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thomco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Comark Direct company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thomco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Comark Direct company.

In the current year, Thomco company and Comark Direct company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thomco company nor Comark Direct company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thomco company nor Comark Direct company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thomco company nor Comark Direct company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Comark Direct company nor Thomco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Comark Direct company nor Thomco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thomco company employs more people globally than Comark Direct company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Comark Direct nor Thomco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N