Comparison Overview

COMAG

VS

Self Managed Super magazine

COMAG

Tavistock Road, West Drayton, Middlesex, UB7 7QE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

COMAG is the UK's most dynamic magazine marketing and distribution company. Formed in 1977, COMAG is owned by two major magazine publishers – Hearst Magazines UK and Condé Nast Publications. As the largest and most influential third party magazine distributor, we represent high profile market leading titles and global brands as well as niche magazines and specialist publications, with frequencies ranging from time-sensitive weeklies to annuals. Our expertise across the business is reflected by our portfolio, which encompasses magazines, partworks and collectables

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Self Managed Super magazine

PO Box 96, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Lindfield, NSW, AU, 2070
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Selfmanagedsuper was launched in 2013 and is aimed at practitioners servicing SMSF clients, including financial advisers, accountants, lawyers, auditors, technical specialists, administrators and fund managers. It seeks to deliver comprehensive coverage of what is currently the largest segment by asset value of the superannuation industry. Subscribers are provided with the latest industry developments from compliance, strategic, technical, investment and practice management perspectives. You can find us online at www.smsmagazine.com.au and follow us on twitter @smsmagazine

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comag-ltd.jpeg
COMAG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/self-managed-super-magazine.jpeg
Self Managed Super magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
COMAG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Self Managed Super magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COMAG in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Self Managed Super magazine in 2025.

Incident History — COMAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COMAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Self Managed Super magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Self Managed Super magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comag-ltd.jpeg
COMAG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/self-managed-super-magazine.jpeg
Self Managed Super magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both COMAG company and Self Managed Super magazine company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Self Managed Super magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to COMAG company.

In the current year, Self Managed Super magazine company and COMAG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Self Managed Super magazine company nor COMAG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Self Managed Super magazine company nor COMAG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Self Managed Super magazine company nor COMAG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither COMAG company nor Self Managed Super magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Self Managed Super magazine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to COMAG company.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither COMAG nor Self Managed Super magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.