Comparison Overview

Colusa Casino Resort

VS

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas

Colusa Casino Resort

undefined, Colusa, CA, 95932, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Colusa Casino Resort invites you to trade ordinary for extraordinary. As your local entertainment destination, we’re pleased to offer our Northern California guests high-energy gaming, world-class entertainment, award-winning dining, and luxurious hotel accommodations. So, what’s stopping you from having the time of your life? Come experience the difference. Location Colusa Casino Resort is located about 50 miles north east of Sacramento, CA and just 12 miles from Interstate 5 at Williams, CA.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 162
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas

3355 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The Venetian® Resort Las Vegas is an important part of our global company, and a standard of luxury and service in the industry. We provide the best benefits, opportunity for advancement, and the greatest professionals with which to work. Our company culture is the result of our commitment to our guests, our Team Members, and our community. We are the world’s largest integrated resort, and our people make it the most successful as well.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 3,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colusa-casino-resort.jpeg
Colusa Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-venetian.jpeg
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colusa Casino Resort
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colusa Casino Resort in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Venetian Resort Las Vegas in 2025.

Incident History — Colusa Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colusa Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Venetian Resort Las Vegas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colusa-casino-resort.jpeg
Colusa Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-venetian.jpeg
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colusa Casino Resort company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colusa Casino Resort company.

In the current year, The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company and Colusa Casino Resort company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor Colusa Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor Colusa Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor Colusa Casino Resort company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort company nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort company nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company employs more people globally than Colusa Casino Resort company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colusa Casino Resort nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H