Comparison Overview

Columbia Journalism Review

VS

Topps International

Columbia Journalism Review

801 Pulitzer Hall, New York, NY, 10027, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cjr.org

The Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) is an American magazine for professional journalists published by the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism since 1961. Its contents include news and media industry trends, analysis, professional ethics and stories behind news. Overall? We're monitoring the press, tracking the evolving media business & encouraging excellence in journalism.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Topps International

18 Vincent Avenue, Crownhill, None, Milton Keynes, England, GB, MK8 0ES
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uk.topps.com

Topps Europe Ltd is a part of The Topps Company, Inc founded in 1938. Topps Europe is a market leader of physical and digital sports cards, entertainment cards and collectibles, and distinctive confectionery products. Topps Europe creates and distributes leading sports and entertainment products include UEFA Champions League, Bundesliga, Star Wars, WWE, UFC and other trading cards, sticker album collections and collectibles.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbia-journalism-review.jpeg
Columbia Journalism Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topps-international.jpeg
Topps International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Columbia Journalism Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Topps International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Columbia Journalism Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Topps International in 2025.

Incident History — Columbia Journalism Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Columbia Journalism Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Topps International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Topps International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbia-journalism-review.jpeg
Columbia Journalism Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topps-international.jpeg
Topps International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Columbia Journalism Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Topps International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Topps International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Columbia Journalism Review company.

In the current year, Topps International company and Columbia Journalism Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Topps International company nor Columbia Journalism Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Topps International company nor Columbia Journalism Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Topps International company nor Columbia Journalism Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review company nor Topps International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review company nor Topps International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Columbia Journalism Review company employs more people globally than Topps International company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Columbia Journalism Review nor Topps International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References