Comparison Overview

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.

VS

Unity Printing

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.

22570 Glenn Dr, Sterling, Virginia, 20164, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

ColorNet Printing and Graphics is a commercial printer with three locations in the Metro DC area. Specializing in High Quality Color Digital Printing and 5 color offset printing. Our bindery is equipped to provide folding, saddle stitching, perfect binding, coil binding and die cutting. We have an in-house mailing department. Our services include addressing, inserting, tabbing, applying postage and delivery to the Post Office. ColorNet provides fast turnaround of your critical project because we control our own schedule by keeping these services in our own production facilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unity Printing

5848 State Route 981, Latrobe, PA, 15650, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Unity Printing Company, Inc. was founded in 1979 by James Ernette. Over the years, the acquisition of several small printing companies contributed to the company’s growth and established it as a leader in the market. Today Unity Printing is under the direction of Ernette’s daughter, Lisa Frederick, and her husband, G. Joseph (Joe) Frederick. In 2014, the company achieved certification as a woman-owned business by the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council. Entering its fourth decade as a full service printing company, Unity Printing is proud to welcome the family’s third generation to the business: Ashley Frederick, daughter of Lisa and Joe, recently completed her degree in Family Enterprise from Stetson University, and now works full-time for Unity Printing. Joe and Lisa also have a son, Cole. Located just south of Latrobe along Route 981 in Westmoreland County, Pa., the company’s facilities are comprised of over 25,000 square feet of office, production, and warehouse space.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colornet-printing-and-graphics-inc..jpeg
ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unityprinting.jpeg
Unity Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unity Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unity Printing in 2025.

Incident History — ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unity Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unity Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colornet-printing-and-graphics-inc..jpeg
ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unityprinting.jpeg
Unity Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company and Unity Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Unity Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, Unity Printing company and ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unity Printing company nor ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unity Printing company nor ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unity Printing company nor ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company nor Unity Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company nor Unity Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Unity Printing company employs more people globally than ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Unity Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N