Comparison Overview

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.

VS

Comark Direct

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.

22570 Glenn Dr, Sterling, Virginia, 20164, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.colornetprinting.com

ColorNet Printing and Graphics is a commercial printer with three locations in the Metro DC area. Specializing in High Quality Color Digital Printing and 5 color offset printing. Our bindery is equipped to provide folding, saddle stitching, perfect binding, coil binding and die cutting. We have an in-house mailing department. Our services include addressing, inserting, tabbing, applying postage and delivery to the Post Office. ColorNet provides fast turnaround of your critical project because we control our own schedule by keeping these services in our own production facilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Comark Direct

3305 Wiley Post, Carrollton, Texas, 75006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.comarkdirect.com

Since 1971, Comark Direct has been Fort Worth’s service and manufacturing pioneer. Today, Comark has grown from a single location local print shop to a multi-plant, print, design, fulfillment and technology company with global reach. We all know that the world is changing quickly, and Comark Direct is leading the charge with powerful program management and analytical business intelligence services customized to help our clients thrive. Combining our best-in-class technology with quick and efficient manufacturing processes gives our service team the tools they need to deliver for our customers. As a direct in-house manufacturer, Comark Direct utilizes cutting edge print and software technologies to produce beautiful on-brand materials to reach and communicate with our client’s audience. Communication results are the name of the game and Comark Direct is ready to help you win!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colornet-printing-and-graphics-inc..jpeg
ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comark-direct.jpeg
Comark Direct
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Comark Direct
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comark Direct in 2025.

Incident History — ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Comark Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comark Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colornet-printing-and-graphics-inc..jpeg
ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comark-direct.jpeg
Comark Direct
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Comark Direct company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Comark Direct company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, Comark Direct company and ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Comark Direct company nor ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Comark Direct company nor ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Comark Direct company nor ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company nor Comark Direct company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company nor Comark Direct company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. company employs more people globally than Comark Direct company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ColorNet Printing and Graphics, Inc. nor Comark Direct holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References