Comparison Overview

ColorMark Printing

VS

Reed & Witting

ColorMark Printing

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.colormark-lc.com

ColorMark is a renowned print and marketing resource located in Carrollton, Texas. Since 1993 we have served as a leader in expedient execution of brand color management and distribution. We have partners with more than 25 years of continuous relationships, and our clients range from premier multi-national fortune 500 companies through sole-proprietor organizations. Award winning services: sheet-fed offset, digital/variable data, large format, store front design and hosting, promotional, direct mail, apparel, pick-n-pack and fulfillment. Our software lifts ColorMark above the crowd. If you believe color management and better color reproduction sells more product, you should contact us now. We can prove our high-definition color, which captures 50% of the RGB color space lost in traditional CMYK output cannot be matched. Our software controls virtual depth, keeping shadow detail visible while ink saturation fills the color gamut.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Reed & Witting

2900 Sassafras Way, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reed-witting.com

We’re Your Perfect Print Partner! Making your life easier by designing valuable print solutions! As one of the oldest and best printing companies in Pittsburgh, Reed & Witting is an industry-leading commercial printer, offering both traditional and digital presses, as well as superwide format printing and fulfillment services. Our A-1 professionals thrive on custom solutions to give your project the extra attention you are looking for. We start with your vision and optimize our expertise for your benefit. We listen. We learn. We are honest. We innovatively partner with our clients and our vendors to excel. Period. passion. precision. print.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colormark.jpeg
ColorMark Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reed-&-witting-company.jpeg
Reed & Witting
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ColorMark Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reed & Witting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ColorMark Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reed & Witting in 2025.

Incident History — ColorMark Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ColorMark Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reed & Witting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reed & Witting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colormark.jpeg
ColorMark Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reed-&-witting-company.jpeg
Reed & Witting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ColorMark Printing company and Reed & Witting company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Reed & Witting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ColorMark Printing company.

In the current year, Reed & Witting company and ColorMark Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reed & Witting company nor ColorMark Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reed & Witting company nor ColorMark Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Reed & Witting company nor ColorMark Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ColorMark Printing company nor Reed & Witting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ColorMark Printing company nor Reed & Witting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ColorMark Printing company employs more people globally than Reed & Witting company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ColorMark Printing nor Reed & Witting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References