Comparison Overview

Colorman (Ireland) Limited

VS

Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc.

Colorman (Ireland) Limited

Broombridge, Dublin, D11, IE
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Colorman (Ireland) Limited is one of Europe’s leading print manufacturing companies. Established in 1959, we have enjoyed significant growth through expansion and investment to become one of the largest and most advanced printing and packaging operations. We work with the biggest brands across a range of sectors including pharma, medical device manufacturing, IT, retail, finance and government. Providing a complete end-to-end solution from our facilities in Dublin.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc.

119 Summit Drive, Exton, 19341, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

For 50 years, Valley Forge Tape & Label has been synonymous with unsurpassed quality and service, a leader and innovator in the label industry since 1962. WE KNOW THE LABEL INDUSTRY... our employees have over 800 years of combined knowledge and customer service with an average time of employment of 17 years. We have earned countless industry awards for EXCELLENCE IN MANUFACTURING, including numerous First Place and Best of Show Awards in FTA (Flexographic Technical Association) and TLMI (Tag & Label Manufacturers Institute) annual competitions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorman-ireland-limited.jpeg
Colorman (Ireland) Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorman (Ireland) Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorman (Ireland) Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Colorman (Ireland) Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorman (Ireland) Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorman-ireland-limited.jpeg
Colorman (Ireland) Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorman (Ireland) Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colorman (Ireland) Limited company.

In the current year, Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company and Colorman (Ireland) Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor Colorman (Ireland) Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor Colorman (Ireland) Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company nor Colorman (Ireland) Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited company nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited company nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colorman (Ireland) Limited company employs more people globally than Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorman (Ireland) Limited nor Valley Forge Tape & Label Co., Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L