Comparison Overview

ColorGATE

VS

Conquest Graphics

ColorGATE

Grosse Duewelstr. 1, Hannover, DE, 30171
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.colorgate.com/

YOUR PARTNER FOR DIGITAL PRINTING Whenever a digital printing system is installed, there is an opportunity to improve its performance with ColorGATE. We bring the know-how, technology and services to enable fast, high-quality and profitable digital printing. Whether you want to integrate eCommerce systems or existing workflows – we have the right solution for your entire production chain. ColorGATE provides the leading technology to manage the appearance of digitally printed products. We empower digital printing processes and innovate business models that save resources and respond quickly to trends and needs. That makes our customers the leaders in their industries - why don't you become one of them? ColorGATE Digital Output Solutions GmbH is an independent subsidiary of Ricoh Company Ltd. since 2018. Imprint: https://www.colorgate.com/imprint/ Data Privacy: https://www.colorgate.com/privacy-policy/

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Conquest Graphics

3900-A Carolina Avenue, Richmond, 23222, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://www.conquestgraphics.com

We opened our doors as Lewis Printing Company in Richmond, Virginia on January 2, 1922. In just four years the business outgrew its space at 21 N.12th Street and moved to 1107 East Cary Street, where it stayed for about 40 years. In 1964, we moved into a larger, custom-built production facility at 900 W. Leigh Street, where we operated for 42 years. In 1990, we changed our name to Lewis Creative Technologies to reflect the changing times. In 1996, we once again opened new doors with an Internet website. In 2006, we moved into a spacious 90,000 square foot facility by Richmond International Raceway and changed our name to Conquest Graphics, and to better serve a growing national customer base, we expanded again to include additional operations, which allow us to provide faster service to West Coast clients. What you may not know about us is that we are one of the largest and oldest privately-held printing companies in the nation. We operate out of two modern, energy-efficient, and secure facilities with over 130,000 square feet of manufacturing space. Today, as a fourth-generation, family business, through the leadership of President, Chris Lewis, we are continuing to grow and make significant leaps and investments in the deployment of technologies that serve our traditional print and digital communications clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorgate-digital-output-solutions-gmbh.jpeg
ColorGATE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conquest-graphics.jpeg
Conquest Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ColorGATE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conquest Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ColorGATE in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conquest Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — ColorGATE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ColorGATE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conquest Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conquest Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorgate-digital-output-solutions-gmbh.jpeg
ColorGATE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conquest-graphics.jpeg
Conquest Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Conquest Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ColorGATE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Conquest Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ColorGATE company.

In the current year, Conquest Graphics company and ColorGATE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor ColorGATE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor ColorGATE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor ColorGATE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ColorGATE company nor Conquest Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ColorGATE company nor Conquest Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conquest Graphics company employs more people globally than ColorGATE company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ColorGATE nor Conquest Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References