Comparison Overview

Colorado Water Congress

VS

Gemeente Rheden

Colorado Water Congress

1580 Logan Street, Denver, CO, 80203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://cowatercongress.org/

The Colorado Water Congress was established in 1958 to provide leadership on key water resource issues and serve as the principal voice of Colorado’s water community. Our belief is that the state of Colorado’s water impacts the state’s overall well-being. We are dedicated to successful promotion of policy that supports high-quality, sustainable water supplies through protection of water rights, conservation, planning, management and infrastructure investment. As such, we strive for thoughtful and equitable development and administration of water laws, regulations, and compacts. The active engagement of our members relies primarily upon education, collaboration, and networking. CWC hosts events year-round, large and small - from the state's preeminent water industry convention to more intimate local events, all engendering collaboration, networking and professional development.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gemeente Rheden

Postbus 9110, DE STEEG, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rheden.nl

Gemeente Rheden ligt tussen de IJssel en de Posbank en bestaat uit zeven dorpen: Velp, Rheden, De Steeg, Ellecom, Spankeren, Dieren en Laag-Soeren.De Posbank, liggend in het Nationaal Park Veluwezoom, geniet landelijke bekendheid. De gemeente heeft zo'n 43.000 inwoners. Onze inzet als gemeente is het waarborgen van de leefbaarheid van onze dorpen. Wij vinden het erg belangrijk om onze inwoners hierbij te betrekken. Daarom wordt het beleidsproces op een interactieve manier vormgegeven. De Steeg · http://www.rheden.nl

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 540
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-water-congress.jpeg
Colorado Water Congress
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-rheden.jpeg
Gemeente Rheden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Water Congress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gemeente Rheden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Water Congress in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Rheden in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Water Congress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Water Congress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gemeente Rheden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Rheden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-water-congress.jpeg
Colorado Water Congress
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-rheden.jpeg
Gemeente Rheden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemeente Rheden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Water Congress company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gemeente Rheden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colorado Water Congress company.

In the current year, Gemeente Rheden company and Colorado Water Congress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gemeente Rheden company nor Colorado Water Congress company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gemeente Rheden company nor Colorado Water Congress company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gemeente Rheden company nor Colorado Water Congress company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorado Water Congress company nor Gemeente Rheden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorado Water Congress company nor Gemeente Rheden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Rheden company employs more people globally than Colorado Water Congress company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Water Congress nor Gemeente Rheden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References