Comparison Overview

Colorado Photographic Arts Center

VS

Dean Michaels Studio

Colorado Photographic Arts Center

1200 Lincoln Street, Denver, 80203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Mission: As a non-profit, CPAC is dedicated to fostering the understanding and appreciation of excellent photography in all forms and concepts through exhibitions, education and community outreach. CPAC benefits the Mountain West region’s photographic community by nurturing new talent, expanding concepts, generating skills, piquing interest, and contributing to a sustainable market for collectors and artists. CPAC is supported by the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District, Bonfils Stanton Foundation, and by funding from the Colorado Creative Industries Division, a state agency, and the National Endowment for the Arts, a federal agency.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dean Michaels Studio

2 Elmer Street, Madison, New Jersey, 07940-1804, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Dean Michaels Studio is the premier wedding photography and cinematography studio in greater New Jersey for over 30 years. As a family owned studio, we take great pride in or stunning wedding portraiture, candid and photo-journalistic photographs and captivating cinematic productions. Our vision is clean, contemporary and creative photography and breath-taking cinematography that is sentimental and exciting. Our unobtrusive approach has brides wondering how we manage to capture all of these special moments while staying behind the scenes! If you have any questions about our New Jersey Wedding Photography and cinematography, do not hesitate to contact us anytime. If you're in the Morris County area, please stop by for a quick hello!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-photographic-arts-center.jpeg
Colorado Photographic Arts Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dean-michaels-studio.jpeg
Dean Michaels Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Photographic Arts Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dean Michaels Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Photographic Arts Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dean Michaels Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Photographic Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Photographic Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dean Michaels Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dean Michaels Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-photographic-arts-center.jpeg
Colorado Photographic Arts Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dean-michaels-studio.jpeg
Dean Michaels Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dean Michaels Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Photographic Arts Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dean Michaels Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colorado Photographic Arts Center company.

In the current year, Dean Michaels Studio company and Colorado Photographic Arts Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dean Michaels Studio company nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dean Michaels Studio company nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dean Michaels Studio company nor Colorado Photographic Arts Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center company nor Dean Michaels Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center company nor Dean Michaels Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colorado Photographic Arts Center company employs more people globally than Dean Michaels Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Photographic Arts Center nor Dean Michaels Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N