Comparison Overview

Colorado Judicial Branch

VS

State of Maryland

Colorado Judicial Branch

1300 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, 80203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Colorado's State Court System Appellate Courts The Colorado Supreme Court is the court of last resort in Colorado's state court system. The court generally hears appeals from the Court of Appeals, although in some instances individuals can petition the Supreme Court directly regarding a lower court's decision. The Colorado Court of Appeals is usually the first court of appeals for decisions from the district courts, Denver Probate Court, and Denver Juvenile Court. The Court of Appeals also reviews decisions of several state administrative agencies. Its determination of an appeal is final unless the Colorado Supreme Court agrees to review the matter. Trial Courts District Courts hear civil cases in any amount, as well as domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, probate, and mental health cases. District court decisions may be appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals (in some cases directly to the Colorado Supreme Court). County Courts handle civil cases under $15,000, misdemeanors, traffic infractions, felony complaints (which may be sent to district court), protection orders, and small claims. County court decisions may be appealed to the district court. Water Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases relating to the determination of water rights, use and administration of water, and all other water matters. There are seven water courts, one in each of the major river basins in Colorado.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 769
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

State of Maryland

301 W. Preston Street, Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21201
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Maryland is on the path to becoming the best state in the nation. Referred to as “America in Miniature”, Maryland embodies the very spirit of the United States. Maryland is home to ethnic groups of every origin, just about every natural feature, and much like our country, opportunity! If you are interested in a rewarding career in public service, consider the following: Full-time employment Part-time employment Contractual work Internships Seasonal work Maryland, where your work truly matters… Join us! State Jobs: https://www.jobaps.com/md/ State of Maryland homepage: http://www.maryland.gov/Pages/default.aspx

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 10,256
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-judicial-branch.jpeg
Colorado Judicial Branch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-maryland.jpeg
State of Maryland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Judicial Branch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Maryland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Judicial Branch in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Maryland in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Judicial Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Judicial Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-judicial-branch.jpeg
Colorado Judicial Branch
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-maryland.jpeg
State of Maryland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

State of Maryland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Judicial Branch company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Colorado Judicial Branch company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas State of Maryland company has not reported any.

In the current year, State of Maryland company and Colorado Judicial Branch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State of Maryland company nor Colorado Judicial Branch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Colorado Judicial Branch company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other State of Maryland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of Maryland company nor Colorado Judicial Branch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch company nor State of Maryland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch company nor State of Maryland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

State of Maryland company employs more people globally than Colorado Judicial Branch company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor State of Maryland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.