Comparison Overview

Colorado Judicial Branch

VS

European Commission

Colorado Judicial Branch

1300 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, 80203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Colorado's State Court System Appellate Courts The Colorado Supreme Court is the court of last resort in Colorado's state court system. The court generally hears appeals from the Court of Appeals, although in some instances individuals can petition the Supreme Court directly regarding a lower court's decision. The Colorado Court of Appeals is usually the first court of appeals for decisions from the district courts, Denver Probate Court, and Denver Juvenile Court. The Court of Appeals also reviews decisions of several state administrative agencies. Its determination of an appeal is final unless the Colorado Supreme Court agrees to review the matter. Trial Courts District Courts hear civil cases in any amount, as well as domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, probate, and mental health cases. District court decisions may be appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals (in some cases directly to the Colorado Supreme Court). County Courts handle civil cases under $15,000, misdemeanors, traffic infractions, felony complaints (which may be sent to district court), protection orders, and small claims. County court decisions may be appealed to the district court. Water Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases relating to the determination of water rights, use and administration of water, and all other water matters. There are seven water courts, one in each of the major river basins in Colorado.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 769
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

European Commission

Rue de la loi, Brussels, BE, 1049
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

The Commission represents and upholds the interests of the EU as a whole, and is independent of national governments. The European Commission prepares legislation for adoption by the Council (representing the member countries) and the Parliament (representing the citizens). It administers the budget and the policy programmes (agriculture, fisheries, research etc.) in cooperation with authorities in the member countries. Visit http://www.europa.eu/ if you want to learn more about the EU, or call the free service number 00 800 6789 10 11 from anywhere in the EU, they speak all 24 official languages. Disclaimer: The European Commission is working to ensure that social networks respect the highest standards of data protection. All users of social networks should be particularly careful about how they disclose their personal information and about how it may be used by third parties and the social network themselves. The presence of the European Commission on LinkedIn does not mean that we endorse or in any way agree with the privacy policy or practices of this professional social media network. Read more about our social media policy → europa.eu/!dyJq74

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 25,686
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-judicial-branch.jpeg
Colorado Judicial Branch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/european-commission.jpeg
European Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Judicial Branch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
European Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Judicial Branch in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for European Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Judicial Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Judicial Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — European Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

European Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-judicial-branch.jpeg
Colorado Judicial Branch
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/european-commission.jpeg
European Commission
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

European Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Judicial Branch company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Colorado Judicial Branch and European Commission have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, European Commission company and Colorado Judicial Branch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither European Commission company nor Colorado Judicial Branch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Colorado Judicial Branch company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other European Commission company has not reported such incidents publicly.

European Commission company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Colorado Judicial Branch company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch company nor European Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

European Commission company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Colorado Judicial Branch company.

European Commission company employs more people globally than Colorado Judicial Branch company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Judicial Branch nor European Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.