Comparison Overview

Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society

VS

A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC.

Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society

3050 Broadway , Boulder, CO, 80304, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society has been created to foster and encourage quality education and training around Group Psychotherapy. We aim to embrace all forms of group treatment and to create dialogue between differing schools of thought. FCGPS will be the gathering place for group leaders of all backgrounds, orientations, and affiliations. We are an affiliate society of the American Group Psychotherapy Association and work to promote their mission in the Four Corners Region. Our goal is to deepen our clinician’s understanding of group treatment so that they can be of better service to their clients. We also aim to encourage the development of local group leaders and psychotherapy techniques and propel them to the national stage.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC.

16946 SHERMAN WAY, None, VAN NUYS, CA, US, 91406
Last Update: 2026-01-22

A Change in Trajectory, Inc. (ACT) is a family-oriented agency that’s committed to narrowing the gap between the developmental path of individuals with special needs and those with typical development. We provide comprehensive behavioral services for infants, children, adolescents, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder and related disorders. We also provide parent education services. All our treatment modalities utilize evidence-based, state-of-the-art ABA strategies. We're equipped with highly professional, courteous staff who are respectful of privacy and are dedicated to the individuals they serve. Our operating model promotes personal growth and positive encouragement for families and team members.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 193
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-group-psychotherapy-society.jpeg
Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-change-in-trajectory-inc-.jpeg
A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. in 2026.

Incident History — Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-group-psychotherapy-society.jpeg
Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-change-in-trajectory-inc-.jpeg
A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company.

In the current year, A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company and Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company nor Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company nor Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company nor Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. company employs more people globally than Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Four Corners Group Psychotherapy Society nor A CHANGE IN TRAJECTORY, INC. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N