Comparison Overview

Colorado Counties Inc

VS

SL Strategies, LLC

Colorado Counties Inc

800 Grant St # 500, Denver, Colorado, US, 80203-2987
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI) is the county commissioners' professional association and is located at 800 Grant St # 500, Denver, Colorado, United States. CCI's missions include representing commissioners' interests at the state legislature, providing education and collaboration opportunities to member counties, and promoting interest in and understanding of county government.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SL Strategies, LLC

undefined, Washington, DC, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The Partners of SL Strategies combine experience developing health care policy and strategy in Congress, the Executive Branch and the private sector. We provide strategic consulting with a particular focus on healthcare, public health, biotechnology, biodefense and pandemic preparedness. With extensive budget and appropriations experience in the legislative and executive branches, we can provide a unique and valuable perspective for our clients.     Our firm knows that every client is unique and deserves dedicated attention and assistance with their specific policy initiatives. We understand the subtleties of the policy and political issues, as well as the nuances of the people and process. We use this knowledge to craft and implement comprehensive strategies and solutions that are individually tailored to meet our clients’ needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-counties-inc.jpeg
Colorado Counties Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sl-strategies-llc.jpeg
SL Strategies, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Counties Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SL Strategies, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Counties Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SL Strategies, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Counties Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Counties Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SL Strategies, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SL Strategies, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-counties-inc.jpeg
Colorado Counties Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sl-strategies-llc.jpeg
SL Strategies, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Colorado Counties Inc company and SL Strategies, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SL Strategies, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colorado Counties Inc company.

In the current year, SL Strategies, LLC company and Colorado Counties Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SL Strategies, LLC company nor Colorado Counties Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SL Strategies, LLC company nor Colorado Counties Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SL Strategies, LLC company nor Colorado Counties Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc company nor SL Strategies, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc company nor SL Strategies, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colorado Counties Inc company employs more people globally than SL Strategies, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor SL Strategies, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N