Comparison Overview

Colorado Counties Inc

VS

DHA Group, Inc.

Colorado Counties Inc

800 Grant St # 500, Denver, Colorado, US, 80203-2987
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI) is the county commissioners' professional association and is located at 800 Grant St # 500, Denver, Colorado, United States. CCI's missions include representing commissioners' interests at the state legislature, providing education and collaboration opportunities to member counties, and promoting interest in and understanding of county government.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DHA Group, Inc.

1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, 20004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

DHA is a full-service Information Technology and Consulting firm dedicated to providing mission-critical services to our Federal Government and commercial clients. Founded by President and CEO David F. Hale in 1994, DHA has been developed and managed under a philosophy that ensures delivery of consistently high quality products and services that meet and exceed the needs and expectations of our clients. Throughout our 16 year history, DHA has steadily built solid relationships and business partnerships, and our reputation for quality, value and excellence is widely recognized and highly regarded by both clients and competitors. DHA has built a strong standing as trusted partners and experts, and we take great pride in our dedicated team members who maintain a proactive “roll up your sleeves” approach to getting the job done. This mentality is evident throughout all levels of the company and is the foundation of DHA’s outstanding performance record and long-term success. DHA is a registered Small Business, Sub-chapter (S) Corporation, headquartered in the heart of Washington, D.C., blocks from the Capitol, White House and headquarters of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, our largest premier client. DHA has additional offices in Crystal City and Quantico, VA as well as Clarksburg, WV.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-counties-inc.jpeg
Colorado Counties Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dha-group-inc.jpeg
DHA Group, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Counties Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DHA Group, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Counties Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHA Group, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Counties Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Counties Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DHA Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHA Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-counties-inc.jpeg
Colorado Counties Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dha-group-inc.jpeg
DHA Group, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DHA Group, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Counties Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DHA Group, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colorado Counties Inc company.

In the current year, DHA Group, Inc. company and Colorado Counties Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DHA Group, Inc. company nor Colorado Counties Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DHA Group, Inc. company nor Colorado Counties Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DHA Group, Inc. company nor Colorado Counties Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc company nor DHA Group, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc company nor DHA Group, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DHA Group, Inc. company employs more people globally than Colorado Counties Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Counties Inc nor DHA Group, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N