Comparison Overview

Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council

VS

Fund for Global Health

Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council

303 E 17th Ave, Suite 910, Denver, Colorado, US, 80203
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Since 1967, the Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council (CBHC) has served as the membership association for Colorado’s statewide system of community behavioral health providers. CBHC member organizations are the backbone of Colorado’s public behavioral health safety net, working to ensure all Coloradoans have access to quality, community-based services tailored to the unique needs and strengths of each community. In order to continue to provide care and enhance services, CBHC also acts as an advocacy organization at both the state and federal level to ensure the continuation and expansion of care across our state. CBHC’s Members Include: 16 Community Mental Health Centers; 1 Specialty Clinic – Servicios de La Raza

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fund for Global Health

undefined, Seattle, WA, 98116, US
Last Update: 2025-11-10

Fund for Global Health is a non-partisan aid and advocacy organization, supporting frontline health workers in Africa and advocating with members of the U.S. Congressional subcommittees that fund foreign aid. In our aid work and our advocacy we focus on expanding the delivery of integrated primary care services by frontline health workers. We work on ways to provide the maximum health benefit per dollar spent, especially for the most vulnerable people. Our advocacy work includes a grassroots network of medical professionals, NGO leaders, academic experts and others with global health experience, supported by the research, outreach and lobbying activities of our Advocacy Fellows. Our advocacy is focused primarily on the members of the House and Senate State and Foreign Operations subcommittees of Appropriations.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-behavioral-healthcare-council.jpeg
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fund-for-global-health.jpeg
Fund for Global Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fund for Global Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fund for Global Health in 2025.

Incident History — Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fund for Global Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fund for Global Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-behavioral-healthcare-council.jpeg
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fund-for-global-health.jpeg
Fund for Global Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fund for Global Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fund for Global Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company.

In the current year, Fund for Global Health company and Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fund for Global Health company nor Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fund for Global Health company nor Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fund for Global Health company nor Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company nor Fund for Global Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company nor Fund for Global Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fund for Global Health company employs more people globally than Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council nor Fund for Global Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H