Comparison Overview

Color OnDemand Inc.

VS

National Custom Labels

Color OnDemand Inc.

2030 South Westgate Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.codla.com/

“The art of bringing your print ideas to life…” Color OnDemand is uniquely positioned to offer a wide variety of creative business solutions to our clients from here in the US and across the globe. We specializes in fine lithography, digital and grand format printing. Furthermore, Color OnDemand offers a complete suite of fulfillment and mailing services to handle even the largest of campaigns. Our services include customized inventory management and a personalized storefront portal for your business which allows users across the nation, or around the globe, to order everything they need to capture market opportunities quickly. In addition to our US based facilities, we offer international special packaging solutions from China, India, Mexico and beyond. Color OnDemand delivers solutions to our clients creatively, cost effectively and on time. With over 30 years of experience, we are uniquely positioned to print, manage and distribute all of your printing needs locally or globally

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Custom Labels

18 South Murphy Ave, Brazil, Indiana, 47834, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://nationalcustomlabels.com

National Printing was founded in Los Angeles in 1963 supplying printed tapes to the aerospace industry. As the computer age began, NPC was one of the first companies to develop 'pin-feed'​ labels to run on the new computer printers. In 1972, National expanded its manufacturing Indiana and joined the NBFA - a trade association of Print Professionals across the country. By the 1980's, National was adhesive coating its own materials and developing labels to run through the new emerging technology of Laser Printers. This innovative and experimental attitude has enabled us to continue to provide custom Labels & Tags to meet our customers demands. We are guided by trusting relationships, an open and honest attitude and respect for our employees and customers. Built on Relationships!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-ondemand-inc..jpeg
Color OnDemand Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalcustomlabels.jpeg
National Custom Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Color OnDemand Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Custom Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Color OnDemand Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Custom Labels in 2025.

Incident History — Color OnDemand Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Color OnDemand Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Custom Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Custom Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-ondemand-inc..jpeg
Color OnDemand Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalcustomlabels.jpeg
National Custom Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Color OnDemand Inc. company and National Custom Labels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, National Custom Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Color OnDemand Inc. company.

In the current year, National Custom Labels company and Color OnDemand Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor Color OnDemand Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor Color OnDemand Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Custom Labels company nor Color OnDemand Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. company nor National Custom Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. company nor National Custom Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Custom Labels company employs more people globally than Color OnDemand Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Color OnDemand Inc. nor National Custom Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References