Comparison Overview

Color House Graphics, Inc.

VS

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.

Color House Graphics, Inc.

3505 Eastern Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49508, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.colorhousegraphics.com

Color House Graphics is a nationwide book manufacturer that provides digital and offset printing, eBook conversions and custom binding styles. CHG uses their advanced technology to provide you with a superior product at accelerated turn-around times. With competitive pricing and personalized services, you will quickly learn that CHG is your go-to manufacturer for all of your printing projects. Visit colorhousegraphics.com for a quick quote.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.

2600 Chicory Road, Racine, WI, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burlingtongraphics.com

About Us : Established in 1984, BGS is 100% employee owned company with 175 employee owners suppling OEM & POP decorative graphics. Racine, Wisconsin is home for our 116,000 square foot ISO 9001:2008 certified facility. Services: Our in house services are tailored to meet your needs. Our capabilities include: design, screen-printing, digital printing, flexographic printing, dome coating, metal stamping, hand leafing, product development, commodity management at our customer’s production facility. Products: Pressure sensitive decals, POP signage, caution/warning decals,metal nameplates, multicolor roll striping, pressure sensitive roll labels, waterslide decals and gold leaf decals. Key Markets: OEM, RV, motorcycle, appliance, automotive, marine, farm and construction equipment, and point of purchase advertising.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-house-graphics.jpeg
Color House Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burlington-graphic-systems-inc-.jpeg
Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Color House Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Color House Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Color House Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Color House Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-house-graphics.jpeg
Color House Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burlington-graphic-systems-inc-.jpeg
Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Color House Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Color House Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company and Color House Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company nor Color House Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company nor Color House Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company nor Color House Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. company nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. company nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company employs more people globally than Color House Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Color House Graphics, Inc. nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References