Comparison Overview

Color Graphics & Communications, Inc.

VS

Record Printing

Color Graphics & Communications, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.colorgraphicsnyc.com

Color Graphics & Communications, Inc., specializes in high profile, complex printing for image-conscious companies that demand their projects be completed perfectly, on time and within budget. Our capabilities include, digital, offset, large format, die cutting, foil stamping and embossing, with a full bindery. We have been around since 1983, and our client list includes: Ernst & Young, New York Life, Citi, The Whitney Museum, The Guggenheim Museum, StructureTone, FXFOWLE, CetraRuddy, God’s Love We Deliver, Housing Works, The Samuel Bronfman Foundation,(etc). These clients value our ability to meet their challenging deadlines, handle their last minute changes, and coordinate their multiple requirements to get difficult projects done. They also value our advice on structuring their projects to cut costs and increase their visibility and to increase their environmental responsibility. Plus, our Midtown location means we can be on site with our clients in minutes.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Record Printing

109 W Washington St, Millstadt, IL, 62260, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.RecordPrinting.Biz

The printing part is not so much of a challenge as is making you look good doing it! We have digital, web to print and offset solutions. These include training manuals, barcoded product tags, die cut card holders .and postcards with drop ship mailing services. Variable data imaging on mailers and booklets can make your project quite measurable and with QR codes, bring your mail back into the digital stream.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-graphics-&-communications-inc-.jpeg
Color Graphics & Communications, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/record-printing.jpeg
Record Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Color Graphics & Communications, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Record Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Record Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Record Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Record Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/color-graphics-&-communications-inc-.jpeg
Color Graphics & Communications, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/record-printing.jpeg
Record Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Record Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Record Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company.

In the current year, Record Printing company and Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Record Printing company nor Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Record Printing company nor Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Record Printing company nor Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company nor Record Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company nor Record Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Record Printing company employs more people globally than Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Color Graphics & Communications, Inc. nor Record Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References