Comparison Overview

Colliers

VS

Savills

Colliers

Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ow.ly/gksi50Rpork

Colliers (NASDAQ, TSX: CIGI) is a leading diversified professional services and investment management company. With operations in 68 countries, our 19,000 enterprising professionals work collaboratively to provide expert real estate and investment advice to clients. For more than 29 years, our experienced leadership with significant inside ownership has delivered compound annual investment returns of approximately 20% for shareholders. With annual revenues of $4.3 billion and $96 billion of assets under management, Colliers maximizes the potential of property and real assets to accelerate the success of our clients, our investors and our people. Learn more at corporate.colliers.com, X @Colliers or LinkedIn.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25,427
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Savills

33 Margaret Street, London, undefined, W1G 0JD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.savills.com

Savills is a global real estate services provider with a network of more than 40,000 people in over 700 offices across the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa and the Middle East. A FTSE 250 company (LON: SVS) headquartered in London, Savills advises corporate, institutional and private clients who are seeking to acquire, lease, develop or realise the value of residential and commercial property in the world's key locations.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,248
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colliers.jpeg
Colliers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/savills.jpeg
Savills
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Colliers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Savills
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colliers in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Savills in 2025.

Incident History — Colliers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colliers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Savills (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Savills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colliers.jpeg
Colliers
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Ransom
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/savills.jpeg
Savills
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Colliers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Savills company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Colliers company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Savills company has not reported any.

In the current year, Savills company and Colliers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Colliers company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Savills company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Savills company nor Colliers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Savills company nor Colliers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Colliers company nor Savills company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Savills company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Colliers company.

Colliers company employs more people globally than Savills company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Colliers nor Savills holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References