Comparison Overview

College of Nurses of Ontario

VS

DEKRA

College of Nurses of Ontario

101 Davenport Road, Toronto, Ontario, M5R 3P1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799

The College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO) is the governing body for more than 180,000 nurses in Ontario, Canada. Recognized internationally as a leader in professional regulation, we protect the public interest by: • setting standards for nursing practice; • establishing the requirements for becoming a nurse; • administering a program that helps nurses maintain competence; and, • enforcing the standards of practice and conduct. We also support nursing regulation in the public interest by: • participating in the provincial legislative process; and, • sharing statistical information about Ontario's nurses. Our Vision Leading in regulatory excellence Our Mission Regulating nursing in the public interest Everything we do is guided by our vision and mission, and helps us achieve our goals. We work in partnership with employers, educators and government so everyone in Ontario benefits from quality nursing services.

NAICS: 92219
NAICS Definition: Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees: 511
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

DEKRA

Handwerkstr. 15, Stuttgart, DE, 70565
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

For 100 years, DEKRA has been a trusted name in safety. Founded in 1925 with the original goal of improving road safety through vehicle inspections, DEKRA has grown to become the world's largest independent, non-listed expert organization in the field of testing, inspection, and certification. Today, as a global partner, the company supports its customers with comprehensive services and solutions to drive safety and sustainability forward—fully aligned with DEKRA’s anniversary motto, "Securing the Future." In 2024, DEKRA generated revenue of 4.3 billion euros. Around 48,000 employees are providing qualified and independent expert services in approximately 60 countries across five continents. DEKRA holds a Platinum rating from EcoVadis, placing it among the top 1% of the world’s most sustainable companies. IMPRINT / PRIVACY STATEMENT: https://www.dekra.com/en/data-protection-social-media/

NAICS: 92219
NAICS Definition: Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees: 10,096
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/college-of-nurses-of-ontario.jpeg
College of Nurses of Ontario
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dekra.jpeg
DEKRA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
College of Nurses of Ontario
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DEKRA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for College of Nurses of Ontario in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DEKRA in 2025.

Incident History — College of Nurses of Ontario (X = Date, Y = Severity)

College of Nurses of Ontario cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DEKRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DEKRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/college-of-nurses-of-ontario.jpeg
College of Nurses of Ontario
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dekra.jpeg
DEKRA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DEKRA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to College of Nurses of Ontario company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

College of Nurses of Ontario company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DEKRA company has not reported any.

In the current year, DEKRA company and College of Nurses of Ontario company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DEKRA company nor College of Nurses of Ontario company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DEKRA company nor College of Nurses of Ontario company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

College of Nurses of Ontario company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while DEKRA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario company nor DEKRA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario company nor DEKRA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DEKRA company employs more people globally than College of Nurses of Ontario company, reflecting its scale as a Public Safety.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither College of Nurses of Ontario nor DEKRA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X